Cowboy06
Professional Positive Naysayer
- Messages
- 1,444
- Reaction score
- 585
The tidy sum would have to include another franchise QB to replace him with. If you trade Romo you're going to have to use some if not all of the resources you get for him to replace him and if you don't replace him with a top flight QB the trade blows up in your face. You're far from guaranteed to come up with a franchise QB with the draft picks you get for him.
There might not be a QB worth taking high in the draft with any of the picks you get for him. If you're getting the #1 overall pick for Romo and there's a highly touted QB sitting there that everyone is drooling over I would take that trade with no hesitation because Romo's clock is ticking. However if I'm not assuring myself of a QB at least equal to him then I'm not making the trade.
We still have time with Romo to get to a SB if we can fix some of the other areas of the team. I'm going to continue to build around Romo because without him we can't win. Romo is the last player I would trade on this team and all you have to do is go back to last season to see why.
For me, I'm interested in trading talent late in their tenure if I can gain some value, but I know the salary cap can cause issues with that. I wish there were more exceptions in the league to allow trades when a play is over a certain age or time in the league. There are many times when another team would LOVE to get a player (ala Romo), but the team that would allow that trade can't due to the cap implications.
Like the post KJJ. Thanks for your input.