If you had to choose, who would you want in pass coverage... Roy W. or Sean T.

Big Country

Rolling Thunder
Messages
3,761
Reaction score
40
We all have said and heard how Roy Williams needs to play at the line of scrimmage and maintain the attack mode at the LOS, leaving pass coverage to someone better able. Conversely, if you think about all the glory and potential they hype upon Commander safety Sean Taylor, it's all rotten baloney IMO... I watched Sean Taylor consistently get drummed in coverage yesterday... even by the Eagles sad sack of WRs. Waaay too often he looks for the kill shot, and in reality, he is horrible in pass coverage... Remember Patrick Crayton burning Taylor last year at the last possible moment to make the winning catch? Galloway should have 200 yards receiving next weekend if he's covered by Taylor playing zone defense.

Yesterday, I thought Philly could have pulled that one out if McMahon had stopped turning the ball over. After Reid pulled McMahon and put in Detmer it was over right there. There was no way the Eagles would come back, Detmer's passing specialty is dumpoffs and screens for 3 yards a play.

Sean Taylor is a big physical presence and he is a prototype size, but I don't think he is cerebral enough to do anything worthy... Unless that boy starts learning how to study film and quit believing the hype he will be just another alum from "DA YOUU" who can't score double digits on the wonderlic test.

I remember Roy Williams rookie season... He of course provided some great highlights, and in all reality, he actually covered pretty well...

A few Roy Williams rookie highlights...

1. His diving interception while in coverage on Jimmy Smith along the sideline was really nice... his post game interview was quoted as saying it's about "game speed."

2. Had a really nice int in the final game of the season that he returned for a TD at Washington and showed he can outrun some guys too if needed...

3. He also had a pick against Washington on Thanksgiving that same rookie year, which was deep in Commander territory and he actually had to just dive to get into the end zone...

4. I also remember that last game against NYG that year when Dallas got whipped, Roy W. shadowed Shockey... Shockey had nothing on Roy during that game. Roy had no highlights or many stats that game because Shockey had none either. Shockey was BIG TIME hype that year... went to the pro-bowl too. That game was the game where afterward the news broke that Jerry had contacted Parcells about returning to coaching... Campo was lame duck thereafter.

All in all... Roy had 5 interceptions his rookie year... FIVE picks. Nowadays it really seems his effectiveness at the second level is negated because opposing offensive coaches always seem to get him in a chase mode, which is not really his strong suit...

Thoughts anyone?
 

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,496
Reaction score
12,515
Clearly , Taylor is a better FS than Roy...it's apples and oranges. Realistically, Taylor would probably be a better SS than he is FS too.

I wish we'd signed Darren Sharper....I thought he was over the hill....boy was I wrong.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,960
Reaction score
26,604
if taylor was so much better how do you explain him having less tackles,less int's,and less sacks than roy?
 

Fan21

Benched
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Conner01,
Do you even know the difference between a FS and a SS?!? That answers your question!

Sean Taylor is a much better player than Roy Williams, no question!
 

Sarge

Red, White and Brew...
Staff member
Messages
33,770
Reaction score
31,537
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Fan21 said:
Conner01,
Do you even know the difference between a FS and a SS?!? That answers your question!

Sean Taylor is a much better player than Roy Williams, no question!

Apparently not. Taylor is a better FS - no debate there.
 

Hiero

New Member
Messages
3,075
Reaction score
0
Fan21 said:
Conner01,
Do you even know the difference between a FS and a SS?!? That answers your question!

Sean Taylor is a much better player than Roy Williams, no question!
actually FS should have a lot of int's. Roy had a better year. Taylor is faster although he seems lost a lot of times. roy gets lost sometimes just not as much.
 

Tio

Armchair QB
Messages
5,344
Reaction score
339
Taylor is better physically, but the dude is a dumbarse who misses assignments much more than most teams would allow. He never picked up LJ Smith who ran right by him for a long pass when the DE let him loose.
 

aznhalf

New Member
Messages
882
Reaction score
0
ST gets burned just as much as Williams. He gave up several long passes in the Eagles game. Not to mention his horrible run support and bad angles.

He lost them the San Diego game.
 

Jay9508

New Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
0
i think roy and sean are on the same level. but sean is faster than roy and better than roy in coverage. roy is a better tackler than sean, sean goes for the kill shot alot, and sometimes it pays off ond alot of times it doesn't.
 

The30YardSlant

Benched
Messages
24,287
Reaction score
0
If you had to choose, who would you want in pass coverage... Roy W. or Sean T.

Let's ask Patrick Crayton:

12-27-2004.ns_27CowboysTDCrayton.GEK1GSE5L.1.jpg
 

Ashwynn

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,777
Reaction score
500
Ah, but who would you rather get hit by as a ball carrier, Sean Taylor or Roy Williams.
 

firehawk157

New Member
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Or we can ask Terry Glenn...

Tglennscared.gif


Anyways, let's look at the Cowboys vs. Commanders matchups then...
Sean Taylor got burnt by P Clayton for TD to win it for the Boys
Roy Williams got burnt by Santana Moss for 2 TDs to blow it for the Boys
Roy Williams got repeatedly burnt by Santana Moss to get blown out by the Skins
Sean Taylor abused the Dallas WRs MULTIPLE times throughout both contests...
Hmmmmmm, who would I take? A guy that can put THAT much fear in a #1 receiver...
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,960
Reaction score
26,604
actually i do know the differense. do you? fs more coverage, taylor less ints.
 

Jay9508

New Member
Messages
256
Reaction score
0
Ashwynn said:
Ah, but who would you rather get hit by as a ball carrier, Sean Taylor or Roy Williams.
i'd rather get hit by roy. roy hits hard, but sean comes with alot of momentum, alot of of times he misses tackles because of that
 

RCowboyFan

Active Member
Messages
6,926
Reaction score
2
Sarge said:
Apparently not. Taylor is a better FS - no debate there.

Hmm.. But wouldn't that mean Taylor should have more Ints? From what I have seen, yeah, one should expect Taylor to have more Ints and better S, atleast as FS.

But I have seen him beat for as many if not more TDs than Roy Williams.
 

Kilyin

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,041
Reaction score
244
firehawk157 said:
Or we can ask Terry Glenn...

Tglennscared.gif


...

Hey , you can't post a link to an image from your hard drive. Guess they don't teach you that over at ES.
 

Sarge

Red, White and Brew...
Staff member
Messages
33,770
Reaction score
31,537
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
RCowboyFan said:
Hmm.. But wouldn't that mean Taylor should have more Ints? From what I have seen, yeah, one should expect Taylor to have more Ints and better S, atleast as FS.

But I have seen him beat for as many if not more TDs than Roy Williams.

Say what you will, I'll take Taylor as a FS over Roy any day of the week.
 

RCowboyFan

Active Member
Messages
6,926
Reaction score
2
Sarge said:
Say what you will, I'll take Taylor as a FS over Roy any day of the week.

OK, I get it, its like me not liking Bledsoe as Cowboys QB :D
 
Top