I see what you're saying, but Randle has already proven that. A solid amount of his carries last year were against 8 man fronts, and he averaged almost 7 yards a carry.
I see "tough yards" brought up a lot, and I don't think many of those people realize that Randle performed fine against 8 man boxes, which is probably going to be the "toughest" thing he's going to see.
The only question I have is durability since it's a relative unknown at this point. He's proven he can run against 8 man boxes, but can he do it for 150-200 carries?
It really irks me how many so called experts keep talking about how our running game is going to sputter with the "all world" Murray toting the rock in Philly. Im going to very much enjoy watching Randle storm through the monster holes this line provided for Murray last year. We will see bigger plays out of Randle. And certainly McFadden will have some big plays with his speed.
We may miss the physical element of Murray, but I truly believe our Oline will now take on that role and provide everything we need for a nasty running game.
Lets see how many of these cats fess up a quarter of the way through the season as our committee running back tandem is tearing it up every week.
It really irks me how many so called experts keep talking about how our running game is going to sputter with the "all world" Murray toting the rock in Philly. Im going to very much enjoy watching Randle storm through the monster holes this line provided for Murray last year. We will see bigger plays out of Randle. And certainly McFadden will have some big plays with his speed.
We may miss the physical element of Murray, but I truly believe our Oline will now take on that role and provide everything we need for a nasty running game.
Lets see how many of these cats fess up a quarter of the way through the season as our committee running back tandem is tearing it up every week.
If we end up with say McFadden with 900 yards and 5 TDs and Randle with 700 yards and 3 tds and say Williams with 400 yards and 3 tds we are actually as well off as with Murray and his production.
that could easily happen.
Murray was 40% of the offense because they allowed him to be. What about the previous 3 years that Murray did diddly? You are thinking as if Murray has done this for 4 years. One year. They gave him 400 carries. Did you see a ton of amazing runs by Murray? I didnt. I saw a guy running hard and getting the yards he was presented with. In 400 carries, how many big runs did he have? How many long TD runs? Not many. The big play element to Murrays game was almost rare. Low TD numbers also for the amount of carries he had. Thats because he didnt have any long TD runs to add to his short yardage ones.
Football is a game of inches not highlights. Breaking off a long run is great but the game is won when you can or can't gain a 1st on 4th and 1.
I'll take substance of flash any day.
It really irks me how many so called experts keep talking about how our running game is going to sputter with the "all world" Murray toting the rock in Philly. Im going to very much enjoy watching Randle storm through the monster holes this line provided for Murray last year. We will see bigger plays out of Randle. And certainly McFadden will have some big plays with his speed.
We may miss the physical element of Murray, but I truly believe our Oline will now take on that role and provide everything we need for a nasty running game.
Lets see how many of these cats fess up a quarter of the way through the season as our committee running back tandem is tearing it up every week.
Murray's LONGEST run last year was 32 yards. No home-run threat what so ever in his best year. Randle ran one for over 60 yards and will do so consistently with our OL.
I don't care about any crow I will say when looking at this team top to bottom the only concerns I have is with the running game and the current RB we have. I hope Randle and McFadden go out and play great I'm not anti either player but when you take away a player who represented 40% of the entire offense and now replacing him with players who have had little impact then anyone with some sense would have at least some concerns.
I see what you're saying, but Randle has already proven that. A solid amount of his carries last year were against 8 man fronts, and he averaged almost 7 yards a carry.
I see "tough yards" brought up a lot, and I don't think many of those people realize that Randle performed fine against 8 man boxes, which is probably going to be the "toughest" thing he's going to see.
They allowed him and he helped produce 1,800 plus yards rushing and this team got over the 8-8 hump with a 12-4 record. In 2013 Murray went to the Pro bowl as well and many were down on Garrett because despite the rushing of Murray he did not run the ball enough to win some critical games. As for big runs he was 2nd in the NFL in runs of 20 plus yards and tied for 1st in rushes of 40 plus yards.
There will be plenty of eating crow on this site as well.Maybe you should worry more about your fellow cowboys fans rather than the experts. Plenty of them think the same thing.
that would completely shock me if he was first or second in those categories. The only explanation would have to be that he simply ran the ball more than anyone so naturally those totals are high.
No doubt that this was the first season where Murray really got a chance to prove what he could do. As Garrett would abandon the run nearly every week. I would see Murray getting pissed on the sidelines in some games when we lost and he wasnt given a chance to run the ball.
If Murray could stay healthy, then I would consider him a top 5 RB in the NFL. But over 4 years, he has not been able to. Without big holes, he is not the type of RB that has the vision or play making ability to create on his own. Give him some holes and he can do some damage.
I look forward to this year proving once and for all that when it comes to running the football, its more about the Oline than it is the RB.
Sure I'm ready for the season right now. I hope the RB we have can go out and prove themselves to be top RB, I hope to see a much improved defense that can shut teams down. I like Murray I have nothing against the guy he went out and gave his best, he was a great guy in the locker room and established some close ties to players like Romo, Witten and Dez who all respect him, as a fan why would I not feel the same.
What I will not do is act like a brat fan and act as if Murray role was nothing and anyone could have done it because if Dallas felt that way then Randle would have been getting a lot more of the workload than Murray. The reason Murray started and took the large load is because they felt he was the better RB.
The point is quite simple. Murray is a better RB than Randle and anyone else the Cowboys have here. I dont think anyone is disputing that. But Murray is NOT the big reason we had a great RG last year. The Oline was the big reason. Then you can look at other reasons for the RG. Murray finally stayed healthy for an entire season. Murray finally got the opportunity to run the ball more with the gameplan. Linehan didnt abandon the run like Garrett always would.
There is two factors here for me:
1. The Oline is 70% of the reason for the great run game
2. With Murray's injury history, no way can you give him a monster contract based on one good/healthy year.
So I was very happy to see the Cowboys do the right thing and let him walk. It would have been financially irresponsible to not do so. Essentially they thought it was more important to sign a 15 sack per year guy than Murray. I completely agree with them. And I saw what some of the experts saw about Murray. That his vision was average and he left a lot of yards on the field when he ran. A back with more speed will create much bigger plays than Murray did.