The thing about that 2009 Saints D--it wasn't just the turnovers. They were a great red zone defense that year (3rd in the NFL). They finished top 5 in both INT and passing TD allowed, which put them at 3rd in defensive pass rating.I think our best chance is to have a mini-version of that Saints team that won the Superbowl -- great offense with a defense that gives up a lot of yards (I think that's unavoidable) but gets a lot of turnovers.
Now that particular quality is highly variable, not teachable (contrary to the majority of media that year who acted like Gregg Williams had figured out how to teach turnovers), and not indicative of a better-run organization... But for one year, it could happen.
Just to clarify my point, I think you are looking for our chances of making the playoffs with a top 5 offense and bottom 5 defense. You need to compare how many teams that met both criteria made the playoffs vs those that didn't make it.
Is a top 5 offense enough to withstand possibly the worst defense of all time? Probably not.
2012 Saints anyone?
There will be occasions (ie. a big lead against a mediocre offense) where it makes sense to grind it out, but not as an across the board kinda strategy.
The Cowboys were not only one of the bottom 5 defenses last season they were one of the bottom 5 defenses of all-time. See how many teams you can name that made the playoffs having an historically bad defense.
My crystal ball is getting some natural interference...so I'll just enjoy my Cowboys when they are good. Then root for them when they are not so good.
I saw a thread the other day by StarOfGlory that motivated me to do a little research of my own and see how deep teams got that possessed a top 5 offense. I went back 10 years and added up all the top 5 offensive teams that made the playoffs. I very excited to find that 36 out of 50 (72%) of those teams made the playoffs.
Some of you might be wondering how many of those 36 teams had a bottom 5 defense like the Cowboys will likely have. I was a little surprised to find that only 7 of 50 teams that possessed a top 5 offense and a bottom defense made the playoffs. Of those 7 teams, exactly zero has won or even appeared in a Super Bowl.
This whole stat thing just took a wrong turn for our Cowboys.
But wait, we have DeMarco Murray and a new offensive coordinator that will run the ball more to keep our putrid defense off the field. Nice try; only 2 of those 7 teams sported a top 5 running game.
There are lots of predictions from so called experts that like to chime in with their little opinions but I tend to look at the facts. The Cowboys MIGHT have a top 5 offense and probably have a bottom 5 defense. The last 10 years of statistics tells us the Cowboys only have a 14% chance of making the playoffs and a 0% chance of winning a Super Bowl.
I will hope and pray that our Cowboys can defy the odds but it doesn’t look very good at this point in time.
We had great average starting field position last year, and we scored a lot of points, but that doesn't necessarily mean those two things were connected. When you actually break down the drives based on their starting points, you see that we often didn't take advantage of good field position. Of course, this was only a small percentage of all drives.Also, someone, I think hoofbite, has pointed out that we were near the top in field position last year, and our offense can't expect to get that same boost from our defense and special teams this year.
As of today, our chances of making the playoffs last year is 0%.
Will we have another historically bad defense this year? It's possible, but nobody knows for sure. You cannot make statements of fact about the future based on past statistics. It's why the super bowl isn't awarded at the start of the season.
If the defense is anything like last years the Cowboys won't be able to grind it out sitting on any kind of lead. We saw a 23 point lead evaporate in no time vs GB last season in a game where Murray rushed for 131 yards. We saw an 11 point lead vanish vs San Diego in a game the Chargers ended up winning by 9 points. No lead is safe with the Cowboys defense on the field. Murray gashed the Bears last season for 148 yards but the Bears scored on every possession they had resulting in a blowout win for Chicago. With the loss of Ware and Hatcher the Cowboys will have very little pass rush this season.
Opponents not having to account for Ware is going to make the Cowboys defense even easier to dissect. If the refs continue into the regular season calling illegal contact as tightly as they did during the preseason the Cowboys are going to hit with one illegal contact call after another. The Cowboys offense is going to have to stay aggressive and hope they can score enough points to overcome all the defensive breakdowns we're going to see during the season.
I was thinking along the lines of cases where they're up 3 scores in the second half against the likes of Ryan Tannehill. Then again, Matt Flynn isn't too far from that so maybe not...
I'd love it if Garrett would hire the best math geeks available out of MIT and have them determine the probabilities for winning/losing based on whether a team with a roster like this punts the ball or goes for it. I guess you'd have to give the defense a few games to see how bad they are, but if they turn out to be a sieve and the offense plays to their expectations then that could make for interesting strategy decisions.
I'd love it if Garrett would hire the best math geeks available out of MIT and have them determine the probabilities for winning/losing based on whether a team with a roster like this punts the ball or goes for it.
It's enough to make the Super Bowl and get blown out by a team with a defense.
That sounds a lot better than going 8-8 to miss the post season though.
This team was good enough to make the playoffs the last 3 years ( at least in this division)but bad coaching and mental mistakes cost them. I don't really think anything has changed.
This!!!! When your coach cost you at least two games a season it is hard to make the playoffs!!!
The thing about that 2009 Saints D--it wasn't just the turnovers. They were a great red zone defense that year (3rd in the NFL). They finished top 5 in both INT and passing TD allowed, which put them at 3rd in defensive pass rating.
To put it in perspective, the only time Dallas ever had a defense that accomplished that (top 5 in all those categories) was 1970.
But on the subject of turnover luck, if everything falls into place, there's no reason we couldn't be a top 20 defense. In 2006, our D ranked 20th in defensive pass rating, and 22nd in points allowed per drive, and we made the playoffs. (The offense was 8th and 3rd in those categories.)
This!!!! When your coach cost you at least two games a season it is hard to make the playoffs!!!
How can these two replies:
Exist on the same forum--in the same thread--and the second one be the one that gets the 'excellent point' response? Am I on crazy pills or something?
How can these two replies:
Exist on the same forum--in the same thread--and the second one be the one that gets the 'excellent point' response? Am I on crazy pills or something?