Is Crawford now a permanent DE? Draft a DT in 1st?

MonsterD

Quota outta absentia
Messages
8,106
Reaction score
5,802
Maybe do a trade down to 7-10 something like that, we draft Rankins, T.Crawford starts at LDE. We start whoever at the other end, a rookie the Raiders FA guy and then let whoever between Gregory or Lawrence who won't be out of the NFL in two years be the starter at RDE or in 2 years be a backup.

Is this a legit plan? I always liked Crawford at DE, a bit scary hoping he can stay healthy, but still same issue at DT.
 

MonsterD

Quota outta absentia
Messages
8,106
Reaction score
5,802
They should sign Dominique Easley and Jason Jones.

I agree wholeheartedly I would make them very contingent on incentive deals, Easley would be a tricky one so we would be able to cut him if there were problems.
 

LocimusPrime

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,091
Reaction score
92,903
Wow. Its sad when we are talking about switching positions and having russell and irving starting.

But thats where we are at currently. Thing could change, but it sure looks yucky right now.
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
Broaddus has already mentioned it as a probable stopgap for early in the season until the Doobie Brothers get back - unless they decide to take one more puff then...


...it's bye bye for a year.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Maybe do a trade down to 7-10 something like that, we draft Rankins, T.Crawford starts at LDE. We start whoever at the other end, a rookie the Raiders FA guy and then let whoever between Gregory or Lawrence who won't be out of the NFL in two years be the starter at RDE or in 2 years be a backup.

Is this a legit plan? I always liked Crawford at DE, a bit scary hoping he can stay healthy, but still same issue at DT.

Good question at this point. I wouldn't say permanent but he can play for awhile as a stop gap until a better solution is found.
 

kazzd58

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,146
Reaction score
584
Nkemdeche i'll take that chance because of his impact potential and i'll take that chance on that potential in 2nd rd

I wont be mad at all put him at the 3 tech and just go..

and again i want to be clear I will take that chance on him based off whats avail in the draft and his traits im sure our def coordinator can get the most out of him
 

JohnnyHopkins

This is a house of learned doctors
Messages
11,302
Reaction score
3,610
Nkemdeche i'll take that chance because of his impact potential and i'll take that chance on that potential in 2nd rd

I wont be mad at all put him at the 3 tech and just go..

and again i want to be clear I will take that chance on him based off whats avail in the draft and his traits im sure our def coordinator can get the most out of him

Are we going for having our front four all suspended at the same time here?
 
Top