Is Dak an elite Top 5 Quarterback?

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is all hypothetical. There is no telling how good Emmitt would've done without Aikman/Irvin, or how good Aikman would've done without Emmitt. You can't say that Emmitt would've won three superbowls without the other two triplets, without the offensive line, without the great defense. They all bound to have still been successful. Plugging any of them in, say the 2016 team, would've improved that team dramatically, given that we haven't had anyone as good in any of those positions since they played, despite having good teams on some years. I take Aikman in the playoffs over Dak or Romo any day.
This is about Aikman...not Emmitt. This is about quarterbacks. Not running backs. Aikman had better teams and better coaching on both sides of the ball. Better talent. Better depth. And most importantly, a committed ground game that knew what its identity was.
 
This is about Aikman...not Emmitt. This is about quarterbacks. Not running backs. Aikman had better teams and better coaching on both sides of the ball. Better talent. Better depth. And most importantly, a committed ground game that knew what its identity was.
And better performance come playoff time. Dak has been part of the reason for some of our playoff losses. You really can't say that about Aikman. Superbowl MVP vs 2-5. I know who I'd trust.
 
Right. You really wanna be a jukebox hero. But you are simply too busy being a one hit wonder. And you do it with unmatched puerility. Take a bow.
You're not going to get far with Cowboys fans by hating on a winner like Aikman, bro.

I don't hate you for trying to find your niche with the Dak over Dallas crowd. Fit in where you can, bro!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
472,124
Messages
14,390,615
Members
24,192
Latest member
Jacksonhill
Back
Top