As it stands, I don't really think there's a conversation to be had.
It's Matthew Stafford. He's a Super Bowl winner who's got the best record in the NFC. The Rams have the best run differential in all of football in the toughest division to boot. He's thrown 32 TDs to 4 INT.
Until something changes, it doesn't seem particularly close.
You know as much as I want to agree with you, some of that doesn't make sense to me, it's almost a contradiction the Rams have one of the best run differentials in football, they have a better team, they have a better defense, the entire year they have a better coaching staff,
so yeah, take that into perspective on what Prescott had to do for his team just to keep them in it that is what MVP means the Most Valuable Player to your team.
At Times, when you see these systems that say San Francisco runs and and look at how some of those quarterbacks that came through there like Baker ,Sam Darnold, even Mac Jones ,looked good even when the starting quarterback wasn't in there, it didn't seem to be a big drop off that's what great systems look when you have great defense great team great running game.
i'm not discounting Matthew Stafford at all but when you say that without really thinking about what you said he'd been on a better team all year it's a little easier to play when you're playing as a group ,smoothly.. I'd Be curious if they had one of those types of guys like San Francisco's had as a backup if Stafford was out would they have missed a beat?
Like I said ,you're right he's the MVP frontrunner right now ,but when you really look at it, Prescott has been better, because of what he's had to deal with all year.
That's just my opinion I don't really care if he wins it or not but you really got to look at the teams the coaching Staffs all of it...
And you give Prescott a solid run game and a decent defense he's almost winning all those games, but he doesn't have that very often whereas guys like Matthew Stafford have it more than they don't...
