Discussion in 'Fan Zone' started by MountaineerCowboy, Feb 12, 2022.
Dak had the NFL rushing leader 2 times in his career also.
I just said he was responsible for some of the issues, how is that deflecting any responsibility from him? If everything was going right for him he wouldn’t have as many 400 yard games as he’s had. There’s a reason he’s had to put up some big numbers to win games. It’s not like he’s getting a lot of help from his running game.
And Dalvin Cook is trash. If you said Elliott was better than Cook over the last 3 years, I dont think you will find many who agreee with you
Don't have the actual numbers in front of me but I don't think Stafford had a 1000 yd rusher his whole time in Detroit. Or maybe one, I forget.
The same could be said about Matt Stafford….he was a perennial loser and got on a team with a real coach and a real team and he’s on a SB….
Isn’t there a klan rally you need to attend to? Cornball? And you moron the article itself brought up their win percentages…..
I honestly don't believe that wins and losses are solely on quarterbacks alone... but it works for many around here that blame ALL losses on Dak, so I guess thats the standard in these parts. Im just speaking their language.
Everyone knew Stafford had the skills. He was the #1 pick for a reason.
Dak on the other hand......
That's who I've compared Dak with. Neither has the X-factor necessary to push their teams over the top. But with enough talent surrounding them, they likely can get it done.
You're absolutely right. That despite me thinking Stafford was always better than Cousins. But I wasn't talking about that situation. I was referring to paying someone inferior market value. Then going up against teams that have a better QB. You have to put the better team on the field. Similar to the way the 49ers keep doing to GB.
Matt Stafford isn't even a big cap hit. I think he's slightly over 10% of the cap. That further helps the Rams stack the team around him. Cousins on the other hand is over 16% of the cap. Making it harder to do the same. You want to eat up 16% of the cap? You need a better QB.
these are all excuses
In the end their careers will be defined by what they do
As I said I’ll take Jones over Dak
Those aren’t excuses they’re the facts. You’re one of those who doesn’t like Dak and will take Mac Jones or whatever QB over him. I get it!
Was Jeff George?
Keep parroting that line though.
The problem is Micah Parsons career will go to waste if they don't get a QB in here that has some talent.
He is my comparison to Dak too even though that's an insult to Cousins.
Depends on the definition of "Class".
If that means similar in abilities, then agreed.
But Dak is better and has more upside, imo...
QUOTE:The problem is Micah Parsons career will go to waste if they don't get a QB in here that has some talent.QUOTE.
There ya go, didn't take long, did it?
I haven’t seen anyone come along that’s said they would rather have Mac Jones over Dak and Parsons. Had we let Dak walk with the corners off the board the Cowboys would have very likely selected Mac Jones at number 11. With no viable starting QB they would’ve had little choice.