Is it just me or is La'Roi Glover getting Pushed around? 34 or 43

jksmith269

Proud Navy Veteran 1990-1995
Messages
3,939
Reaction score
57
Yesterday he was easily blocked and pushed around by the Raiders. Now I know he has been in previous weeks but in those previous games we played a 34 this week we played more 43 and nickle than anything.

Did we make a move back more to the 43 because how he has been being manhandled. Look at the numbers he has 1 sack and 8 tackles in 4 games.

and what happened to the blitzes? other than against the chargers and first 56 min against the skins we haven't blitzed much at all. Whay gives is Zimmer the real cause?
 

NovaCowboy

Benched
Messages
634
Reaction score
0
Glover has done pretty well IMO. Even in the 3-4 where they said he was too small, he still got pressure on the QB.
 

Everlastingxxx

All Star
Messages
7,209
Reaction score
188
jksmith269 said:
Did we make a move back more to the 43 because how he has been being manhandled. Look at the numbers he has 1 sack and 8 tackles in 4 games.

At least in the 43 we could stop the run. And you are right, Glover is being pushed around as is Singleton.
 

CrazyCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
32,287
Reaction score
440
NovaCowboy said:
Glover has done pretty well IMO. Even in the 3-4 where they said he was too small, he still got pressure on the QB.

I believed he also had a sack if not for an off sides penality on Ware.
 

NorTex

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,290
Reaction score
364
CrazyCowboy said:
I believed he also had a sack if not for an off sides penality on Ware.

Glover did have a sack that was nullified because of Ware's penalty. It was a huge play too. Probably would have kept them out of field goal range. Instead they end up making a field goal on that drive.

The seven yard sack would have put the ball at our 45 yard line.
 

btcutter

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,309
Reaction score
2,584
We didn't blitz much because of Moss. That's also why there was only 1 big gainer by Oakland. You live and die by blitzing. If we did blitz and got burned, this board would gang rape Zimmer for being so stupid.

Glover is being handled most of the time in 3-4. We saw 4-3 exclusively in 4th quarter because 3-4 couldn't handle the run.
 

RoyTheHammer

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,801
Reaction score
1,850
btcutter said:
We didn't blitz much because of Moss. That's also why there was only 1 big gainer by Oakland. You live and die by blitzing. If we did blitz and got burned, this board would gang rape Zimmer for being so stupid.

Glover is being handled most of the time in 3-4. We saw 4-3 exclusively in 4th quarter because 3-4 couldn't handle the run.

IMHO...we should probably start playing predominantly in a 4-3. We seem to have much better success when we run that as opposed to the 3-4.
 

jksmith269

Proud Navy Veteran 1990-1995
Messages
3,939
Reaction score
57
btcutter said:
We didn't blitz much because of Moss. That's also why there was only 1 big gainer by Oakland. You live and die by blitzing. If we did blitz and got burned, this board would gang rape Zimmer for being so stupid.

Glover is being handled most of the time in 3-4. We saw 4-3 exclusively in 4th quarter because 3-4 couldn't handle the run.
Funny Moose even commented on us playing mostly 43 early in the third quarter.
 

junk

I've got moxie
Messages
9,294
Reaction score
247
My guess that this version of the 4-3 that is being run isn't a 4-3 in the sense that we...and Glover are used to.

What do I mean by that? Even in these 4-3 type schemes, Glover probably still has some two gap responsibilities. That isn't his forte. Glover is primarily a one gap penetrating DT. It doesn't surprise me in the least that he is being shoved around trying to play a 3-4 nose. Its a poor fit.

Interesting topic though, I may have to rewatch to see what he is doing in the four man lines that aren't nickel.
 
Top