Redball Express
All Aboard!!!
- Messages
- 16,253
- Reaction score
- 12,758
I have a much different approach. To me the question is not if the player is a good one and deserves to be paid like the other top players.
To me the question is how much does it effect my football team to have a player like him compared to the investement i made in him. Again: regardless of position or the players ability.
In the years i followed the NFL and decissions by GMs/trainers etc. my conclusion is: You dont pay big bucks to any player. You did that in the times before the CBA and everything. But it is not the way to win in the NFL these days.
There are position you can argue: Passrusher, OLT, QB. Everything else imo is out of question. You dont need a franchise WR, TE or RB to win in this league.
Having alot of good starters and solid backups is much more valuable then having 2-3 franchise players. Because for the later you sacrifice too much else.
That does not work if you have the wrong draft strategy (our main problem imo).
In the end i would try to trade Dez or let him walk at the end of his rookie contract if he is not willing to accept a mid range contract (which he def. will not). I'd build my receving corps throu the draft and solid-2-good FAs who are in the age to get their second contract.
So short answer: No. And it has nothing to do with how good Dez is.
If this team was on the brink of being good over the next couple of years and we needed him..
I'd say pay him.
But this team is so far away from even being competitive..
no.
You let him go and let him suck somebodies cap.
Not ours.
Keeping Dez means we keep Romo.
Both have to move on before the team improves.
First..
Garrett has to go.
Without that..nothing is going to improve.
I keep thinking back to the off-season where Jones said getting rid of Garrett means they would lose out on all the experience Garrett has gotten so far.
What an insane statement.
We need to lose this 'experience' of being losers.
Neither Dez nor Garrett nor Romo has been able to win.
I can do without these 'experiences'.