jazzcat22
Staff member
- Messages
- 77,209
- Reaction score
- 95,764
Nope
Why not? Elaborate and explain.
Don't just say nope.
We want to read your analysis.
Nope
When Cooper was back in the lineup, Cooper was still missing in action
You misspelled Dak.
I hope so because he's now Dallas's #1 WR.
Why not? Elaborate and explain.
Don't just say nope.
We want to read your analysis.
Dallas though is the only team that doesn’t try to get their #1 involved early and often.Not that my analysis means much but he has inconsistent hands, lacks separation at times and disappears for stretches of games. He’s not, IMO, a true #1 receiver but rather a nice complimentary #2. Just my two cents.
Cooper wasn’t a true number 1, that didn’t stop you from trying to run the offense through him
Dallas though is the only team that doesn’t try to get their #1 involved early and often.
This goes back to Dez.
Look at the 49ers first drive. How many times did Deebo touch the rock? Plenty
We often go into halftime when guys like Cooper, Lamb etc have 0 catches.
Teams like the Rams, Chiefs don’t allow this.
Bingo. I’m coming out hitting a quick slant, a few screens and my guy is going to have 5 touches before the second quarterI agree with everything you said. I think it was Parcells who said in a tight game, when you need a play, you don’t try and out scheme the opponent but rather just get the ball to your best playmakers. I feel like KM tries to get too cute and he out schemes himself. Against SF I would have been feeding Pollard and Coop and Cee Dee the ball. I’m hoping KM grows in his position and learns from his mistakes.
YES no debate needed but you all will waste time doing it anyway.I hope so because he's now Dallas's #1 WR.
yeah he is / was. i’m not sure you’re qualified to discuss wr’s though
agree Lamb and Gallup are both 1s not elite but still its on KM to one get run game threat , clean up the OL and scheme these stars to have better success.I agree with everything you said. I think it was Parcells who said in a tight game, when you need a play, you don’t try and out scheme the opponent but rather just get the ball to your best playmakers. I feel like KM tries to get too cute and he out schemes himself. Against SF I would have been feeding Pollard and Coop and Cee Dee the ball. I’m hoping KM grows in his position and learns from his mistakes.
Bingo. I’m coming out hitting a quick slant, a few screens and my guy is going to have 5 touches before the second quarter
Yes, but that's a far cry from comparing him to Thompson and TWill.People simply act like Lamb is not capable of being / becoming a number one.
That is what I see also. I do like Lamb, just don't love him.Not that my analysis means much but he has inconsistent hands, lacks separation at times and disappears for stretches of games. He’s not, IMO, a true #1 receiver but rather a nice complimentary #2. Just my two cents.
No.....drops too many balls......he can be if he's more focused. I hope so tooI hope so because he's now Dallas's #1 WR.
Seriously, Cee Dee is not a #1 receiver, The dude's numbers don't support that title and he's got to clean-up the number of balls he drops in BIG games.I hope so because he's now Dallas's #1 WR.