jday
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,321
- Reaction score
- 13,284
Just saw another thread showing how the lowest rated players on defense last year were Wilber, Holloman and Carter. Not to mention, Sean Lee hasn't played a full season since high school.I'm just wondering if LB might be the weakest part of our defense.
If I was a betting man, I'd say Lee misses 4+ games this season. Carter has the potential to be a bust and off the roster mid season. And our only other LBers are 2nd year Holloman and a guy without a true position in Wilber.
I'm starting to think we're much more set on DL and the secondary than LB. And I think we're awful on DL and secondary.
It's an interesting take and I am aware of the thread you are referring to because I was a part of that discussion. As I stated on that thread, there are alot of variables that should be considered before completely writing off Carter, Wilber and Holloman. The first and most prominent being that they were in a new system last year, moving from the 34 to the 43. This move likely impacted them more than anyone because they were forced into completely different positions as a result with completely different assignments and responsibilities. The 2nd is that they were asked to maintain gap responsibility when they were lined up with guys they could not possibly trust, with scrubs no one had ever heard of being brought in to replace injured starters; particularly on the DL, which would negatively impact the linebackers more than anyone else on defense. Lastly, something I did not mention on that thread but warrants mentioning is the offense failed miserably in maintaining long sustaining drives that would have kept them performing at their peak throughout the game. I wonder how much of those negative plays Pro Football Focus tallied occurred in the waining minutes of the games?