Is this the new Cowboys Model

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,405
Reaction score
10,073
A success for 8-8 type seasons. The Beard was great!!! T-Will good, but that's it.. JJ is debatable I guess. I'd replace him in a heartbeat if we could.

Nonetheless, it was a success. Even you admit it. You can't have your cake and eat it. NO need to be a negative nanny and try to spin it. That draft was successful - enough said.
 

Longboysfan

hipfake08
Messages
13,316
Reaction score
5,797
Well spoken and nice article.
But you can't think you team can live on comp picks.
They are usually later round picks 4th and beyond - Ask Adam about that.
So even though you lose a quality player you will not get that level of pick back.
It's nice that you get some help from the NFL - but it's mandated and slanted to the back of the draft.
 

mitchell2254

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,070
Reaction score
777
Ok look at it :
2014: 4,5,6,7 horrible.
2013: 2,4,5,6 horrible
2012: 1,3,4,5,6,7 horrible
2011: 3,5,6,,7 horrible
2010: 3,4,5,6,7 horrible

These aren't even the average picks. These are the horrible ones. We average one good pick a year. That's not how you get the job done!!! That's how you have one good season every ten years. I expect way more!!!

You lost me when you called Randle a "Horrible" pick. What exactly are you expecting of a 5th Round Pick? 9.7 Yards per carry?
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
To operate like this you have to win in the draft. Not so sure the Cowboys are capable of it, but the Cowboys actually get a lot of compensatory picks anyway.

Yeah clearly Dallas has sucked at that the last handful of years....T. Smith, Dez, Williams, Fred, Martin, Hitchens, Murray, Scandrick, D-Law are all players in the last handful of years who are good players or appear to be good players.
 

MrPeanutbutter

What is this, a crossover episode?
Messages
4,104
Reaction score
3,099
This is the blueprint for a winning football program, but the team has to win on the field. We will see.
 
Top