It wasn't just Romo!

[Cebrin]

No you just didn't understand my first post. And this is Romo's second good o-line.....

When was his first one? The one that crumbled against Minnesota?

 

[EST_1986]

Brady has done more with less, laughable comparison....

When exactly has he done more with less?

 

[CF74]

When was his first one? The one that crumbled against Minnesota?

Yeah prior to the collapse in 2009, we went 13-3 in 2007. The o-line was good back then....

 

[CF74]

When exactly has he done more with less?

Practically his entire career Brady has done far more with far less than Romo has done with far superior talent on the offense.. If Brady had our offense it would be ridiculous, he's never had a Dez just an over the hill Randy Moss....

 

[EST_1986]

Practically his entire career Brady has done far more with far less than Romo has done with far superior talent on the offense.. If Brady had our offense it would be ridiculous, he's never had a Dez just an over the hill Randy Moss....

Oh I thought you talking about Brady's current team compared to his previous teams. You're right if you're comparing Brady's teams with Romo's teams. Romo has had far superior talent over the years and consistent talent.

 

[joseephuss]

Oh I thought you talking about Brady's current team compared to his previous teams. You're right if you're comparing Brady's teams with Romo's teams. Romo has had far superior talent over the years and consistent talent.

I think Romo has had better skill position players around him than Brady. Tom has played behind far better offensive lines than Tony.

 

[Cebrin]

Yeah prior to the collapse in 2009, we went 13-3 in 2007. The o-line was good back then....

The youngest of that group which had been assembled long before Romo came to town was 28 years old. They were all large, old and clobbered with injuries. That O Line diminished shortly after and what was left became the most penalized OL in history. The only reason they looked half as good as they did was because of Romos ability to scramble (And a pretty decent defense). Even better then as a young man. That showed in 2006 when Bledsoe was sacked 8M times and pulled for being a non mobile QB. Not to mention that Romo didn't have a 1,000 yard rusher until Murray (unless you count his half season replacing Bledsoe where Jones rushed for barely over 1,000.) Tom Brady won those rings with a great coach, a sturdy oline, better than average receivers, a more than good defense and just about the easiest division in the afc even to date. (Jets, Bills, Dolphins). Meanwhile we've got the Giants (2 SB trips in Romo's tenure) The Eagles (1 SB trip in Romo's tenure) and the Skins which aren't much to speak of. The year you speak of, The Giants D was very good but plagued with injuries in the early season. They reassembled towards the end and we had to play them for a 3rd time (How many times can you beat a division rival with that kind of talent). They went on to defeat those NE Patriots. I'm not discrediting Brady by any means but, he's had a much better set up in NE than Romo has had in Dallas. From top to bottom. This Franchise has been laughable at always leaving holes somewhere. They've really struggled to build a team here for a while. My God we were so close then though.

 

[CF74]

The youngest of that group which had been assembled long before Romo came to town was 28 years old. They were all large, old and clobbered with injuries. That O Line diminished shortly after and what was left became the most penalized OL in history. The only reason they looked half as good as they did was because of Romos ability to scramble (And a pretty decent defense). Even better then as a young man. That showed in 2006 when Bledsoe was sacked 8M times and pulled for being a non mobile QB. Not to mention that Romo didn't have a 1,000 yard rusher until Murray (unless you count his half season replacing Bledsoe where Jones rushed for barely over 1,000.) Tom Brady won those rings with a great coach, a sturdy oline, better than average receivers, a more than good defense and just about the easiest division in the afc even to date. (Jets, Bills, Dolphins). Meanwhile we've got the Giants (2 SB trips in Romo's tenure) The Eagles (1 SB trip in Romo's tenure) and the Skins which aren't much to speak of. The year you speak of, The Giants D was very good but plagued with injuries in the early season. They reassembled towards the end and we had to play them for a 3rd time (How many times can you beat a division rival with that kind of talent). They went on to defeat those NE Patriots. I'm not discrediting Brady by any means but, he's had a much better set up in NE than Romo has had in Dallas. From top to bottom. This Franchise has been laughable at always leaving holes somewhere. They've really struggled to build a team here for a while. My God we were so close then though.

It still doesn't negate my original statement, Brady has done far more with far less.. Even McNabb in his prime did more with less...

 

[Cebrin]

It still doesn't negate my original statement, Brady has done far more with far less.. Even McNabb in his prime did more with less...

Agree to disagree. It negates plenty.

 

[burmafrd]

It still doesn't negate my original statement, Brady has done far more with far less.. Even McNabb in his prime did more with less...

actually you are full of crap.

but then romo haters are usually somewhat divorced from reality,,,,

 

[DandyDon1722]

actually you are full of crap.

but then romo haters are usually somewhat divorced from reality,,,,

He's a good poster who knows his stuff but two things he has NEVER answered. He once complained about what has Romo ever done with good talent - he won 13 games and without two TD drops probably would have won a playoff game. The other one is he refuses to comment on is the fact that Brady has thrown three INT's in two two separate AFC Championship games and won them both. He absolutely sucked and won - how is that possible? I thought Brady carried the team with less talent? What happened - did that less talent suddenly rise up and bail their quarterback out? You meant that actually happens? You mean when Big Ben has a QB rating of 26 in a Super Bowl his team was outstanding?

No way!

Brady has had the benefit of superior coaching with a superior organization. Brady is a better quarterback than Romo, most intelligent people would not dispute that. However, most anti Romo posts have to be personal (for whatever reason) because no rational fan (outside of face painters who have to clue - and he's better than that) could ever have this much dislike for a quarterback that who at the very least given us a chance.

Finally, none of the ten per centers EVER respond to Percy's posts that give clear empirical evidence on several levels that historically, no quarterback could've won consistently with some of the defenses we have been putting out. The ten per centers keep getting marginalized and their backs are against the wall and they try to come up with stuff and hope it sticks.

 

[zrinkill]

It still doesn't negate my original statement, Brady has done far more with far less.. Even McNabb in his prime did more with less...

I see you will still say anything to push your ignorant agenda.

How many threads and posts do you have to get erased before you are not allowed to anymore?

 

[TellerMorrow34]

Geez I had to read way down the page just to figure out who the heck this thread was even about.