garyv
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,241
- Reaction score
- 1,747
because IT HIS JOB...slow part of the year , its just an update not breaking news on ESPN..lolSo after reading, nothing new! Why even report this?
Dilliard wasnt a starterhers what im concerned about Eagles LT broke his arm and now who knows 6 weeks out maybe they go after Peters and we lose.
because IT HIS JOB...slow part of the year , its just an update not breaking news on ESPN..lol
Because it's FishSo after reading, nothing new! Why even report this?
Eight plus threads on 40 year old Peters. You'd think we were waiting on Deebo or something.So after reading, nothing new! Why even report this?
Eight plus threads on 40 year old Peters. You'd think we were waiting on Deebo or something.
exactly this isn’t an earth shattering signing….he’s a 40 year old bum, whose been a FA all offseason, other than a physical, it should be a fairly simple one year take or leave it deal.Eight plus threads on 40 year old Peters. You'd think we were waiting on Deebo or something.
The Eagles don't have the money to make him an offer better than the Cowboys offer. Why is this hard to comprehend?hers what im concerned about Eagles LT broke his arm and now who knows 6 weeks out maybe they go after Peters and we lose.
Lol, he is the best tackle available and played well last year. You are totally ignorant.exactly this isn’t an earth shattering signing….he’s a 40 year old bum, whose been a FA all offseason, other than a physical, it should be a fairly simple one year take or leave it deal.
He was the backup. They have Jack Driscoll who can play if either starter goes down. A 5th tackle would be wasted $$ at this point for 6 weekshers what im concerned about Eagles LT broke his arm and now who knows 6 weeks out maybe they go after Peters and we lose.
Do peters start if signed? And if yes, why would they wait until now?