There have been threads here in the past laughing about Booger McFarland as an announcer.
There have been threads here laughing at Joe Buck. Yet, FOX decides to pay him millions of dollars every year, as does ESPN with McFarland. Your dislike of McFarland does not make his highly-paid opinion any less correct. He could be wrong (I don't think he is) but his opinion is just as valid, if not more valid, than yours.
With enough snaps played, Cowboys fans will hate one of the Safeties unless both are All-Pro.
Weird opinion and not really a fact or valid point. Cowboys fans hate on or exaggerate all types of players and positions. Most of us are just sick of the decade of sub-par safety play.
Fans see players in the camera frame after a big play and blame those players.
Fans also see the Cowboys trying to trade for an impact player at his position.
- Once fans have seen the same player in the frame after a few big plays, then that player is going to become a hated player.
- By definition of the position, a Safety is most often going to be in the camera frame after a big play.
- Fans will hate the player even if he made a great play coming from the far side of the field to save a TD because he was involved with the big play allowed.
There's some truth to this but is also the case with corners and left tackles. The average fan only sees or hears their names when they are beaten badly or commit a penalty. None of this explains the countless stats that have been provided that show Heath is not playing at an acceptable level. The very team you rush to apologize and make excuses for has actively tried to replace him more than once now.
I get it, you like stats, and you like defending the Cowboys. Your objectivity is an issue though and it makes it really hard to consider your data or takes as anything other than cheerleading for the Front Office. I'm sure you can say my criticism has the same effect with my takes. The difference is that I don't pretend I'm better than anyone.