Most opinions of Jerry Jones are somewhere on the Satan to Rasputin scale. Jerry Jones is a "football" guy, certainly compared to many team executives, including some GMs. He was an all-SWC guard at Arkansas and started on a national championship team. His family bubbles football. He now has spent circa three decades running an NFL team. And that football knowledge might lead to some problems. It isn't that he knows nothing. Clearly he knows a great deal about the game -- and certainly more than the average fan. People might not enjoy hearing that, which has nothing at all to do with whether it is true.
But the owner/GM combination is tough. One, it would be a great deal to ask of anyone. It must be remarkably time-consuming. Two, there surely are times when the interest of an owner do not necessarily run parallel with the interest of a GM. An owner is beholden to doing what is, in his or her judgment, in the league's interest. A GM should be focused on the team's interest. Three, an owner is not accountable to a boss. Ultimately a GM can be fired. An owner can only sell the team.
I certainly think Jones was a great owner through the championship years, and he was probably a strong GM as well. Yes Johnson bought the groceries. But Jones almost certainly handled many other traditional GM duties, including handling contracts. Jimmy Johnson was head coach and the lead personnel guy, but there is no evidence he did the entire job of a GM.
The Cowboys were unfortunate in the timing of full free agency. It came along when the Cowboys were the league's best team, so naturally their talent was desirable and in many cases overvalued. It was almost inevitable they would suffer on the field. But that is not to excuse poor drafts. They became cocky and arrogant and even had what they called a "special teams" draft. Jones has to take responsibility for those blunders.
As to Johnson's departure -- look at Johnson's track record and personality before laying too much blame at Jones' feet. Johnson never stayed anywhere very long, a fact that he is acknowledged. Johnson wanted to be in Miami. And loyalty is not one of Johnson's qualities. It might be Jones' best quality. Johnson did a great job at Dallas, but he is a deeply unusual guy. Deeply unusual. Jones couldn't handle it, but I'm not sure many people could have handled it. I'm not excusing Jones' ego, but my sense if that Johnson intentionally played the weakest part of Jones' character -- his ego. Johnson is a manipulative guy.
The fact Johnson was essentially a failure at Miami also is forgotten. He was not the same coach. This suggests that Jones did have something to do both with Johnson's success and with the team's success. Critics don't want to hear that, but the evidence is what the evidence is. Both Jones and Johnson underestimated each other's contributions, and they both suffered for it. The depth of Jones' anger -- and frankly an example of his ability to be petty -- is the fact a coach that led the team to Super Bowl titles isn't in the Ring of Honor. But Jones probably feels Johnson isn't an honorable guy.
In my view, as I've written, Jones overcompensated while trying to prove that he didn't need Johnson. He made unwise personnel decisions and tried to spend the team to glory, a model that hasn't proved successful in the NFL. The team suffered on the field for a few years because of age and talent drain. The it suffered another decade-plus for Jones' frantic overcompensation. These were the worst Jones "GM" years. Another owner would have fired him.
Jones has gotten his feet back under him in recent years. Decisions have improved. Talent has improved. But Jones is paddling against those lost years. One cannot blame fans for including those years in an assessment of Jones' performance. It has been a long time since Jones won. Of course fans have had enough.
But if Dallas stays on its present track, there will be success. In fact, there has been success, though playoff losses are the elephant in the room. Those failures must be included in any assessment of recent years, but they are not necessarily predictive of future results. If recent decisions continue, there will almost certainly be playoff success.
Jones has been deeply loyal to Jason Garrett, which at this point seems to be a mistake. But there are signs that the loyalty could still be rewarded. We will see. I suspect Garrett better prove Jones ultimately correct next season. This season was odd, even by Cowboys standards. Suspensions and injuries hit the team's best players. And a second-year QB was unable to cover warts. I'm not sure that should have been a surprise. In fact, even before many of the negatives occurred, a lot of folks were predicting a 9- to 10-win season. This is still a very young team. But it ought to be mature enough to make a strong recovery next season. That's on Garrett.