Jones and MBIII passing game thread

Muhast

Newo
Messages
7,661
Reaction score
368
Why do we refuse to throw screens to JJ? MBIII looked good as a check down back, JJ would look better imo.

Im all for keeping both of them in, I dont care if MB lines up at full back, I like having them both in the game. Barber is so tough.

But I want to see more passes thrown there way
 

03EBZ06

Need2Speed
Messages
7,984
Reaction score
411
Muhast;1711719 said:
Why do we refuse to throw screens to JJ? MBIII looked good as a check down back, JJ would look better imo.

Im all for keeping both of them in, I dont care if MB lines up at full back, I like having them both in the game. Barber is so tough.

But I want to see more passes thrown there way
There was one screen play with JJ and he gained good yards, I think it was good for nearly 20 yards but an offensive penality nullified it.
 

Muhast

Newo
Messages
7,661
Reaction score
368
I know, same thing happened against the bills.

it works, penalty takes it away and we never run it again
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
03EBZ06;1711728 said:
There was one screen play with JJ and he gained good yards, I think it was good for nearly 20 yards but an offensive penality nullified it.

That seems to be a trend when you play the Patriots...
 

adamknite

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,226
Reaction score
805
03EBZ06;1711728 said:
There was one screen play with JJ and he gained good yards, I think it was good for nearly 20 yards but an offensive penality nullified it.

That is the story of JJ's career.
 

ZenItRam

Member
Messages
416
Reaction score
0
I agree. We have a couple of backs that could be a threat in the passing game and we just don't get the ball to them. It seems that if we do that (burn them by passing underneath) then the long routes would begin to open up.
 
Top