TheRomoSexual
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,057
- Reaction score
- 4,958
There has been next to no press about Brent . This is a non-issue.
I'm telling you how the law works. I have quite a few family members in law enforcement and know DUI attorneys and have 2 friends that are law professors.
Whether you like it or not, when a person gets into a car with a person that they know is drunk (Brown was with Brent the entire night and knew he was drinking) and that person gets killed, the law places some responsibility on the victim.
By the law...it unlike the Rice situation.
YR
So . . . so . . . um, so the victim shares some of the blame, huh?
Yeah, Steven A. might half been correct: Rice girlfriend might also be culpable . . . ouch! i rolled mein eyes so far back it hurt . . .
I no know one in law enforcement except for the PO who bugs me but I half never heard of that concept in the law: division of fault in criminal cases.
I half heard of that concept in civil suits but not in the criminal side.
So, using that logic and reasoning, i feel comfortable in being mein own attorney if the situation should arise and pointing to the defendant and heaping blame. I kinda like that concept. Your high honor of the court, je 'cuse the defendant for provoking me in subtle and nuanced ways and therefore I am only partly to blame. Also I blame society and move that all charges be dropped and the D.A don't give me no dirty looks!
Really, with the concept, the possibilities are endless.
The bank that tempts the robber. The guilty ATM withdrawer who flaunts her money so an onlooker feels compelled to take the money and run. The speeder who blame the automaker for making a fast car (good title for a song) or the scammer . . . well the possibilities are endless.
Hey, stay alive at 55.
Your analogies are not even close to be apples to apples. More like apples to sledgehammers.
Both players should be in jail, but this nonsense of blaming Goodell who isn't law enforcement and doesn't have access to prosecutors evidence since it was under court order seal to present to the grand jury.....the mediot's who seem to be all on their high horse about what evidence Goodell should of had or seen, if it was so easy to obtain as the media thinks, why didn't the media get a hold of this video seven month's ago...if anything, the prosecutors are the ones that should be held accountable for their failure to fully prosecute both of these incidents, especially when there's video of Ray Rice knocking out his then Fiancee....
The new evidence looked like she was coming at him to cause harm.
Goodell is a problem.
Such a different situation. Josh Brent has the support of Jerry Brown's mother which is enough for me.
Both players should be in jail, but this nonsense of blaming Goodell who isn't law enforcement and doesn't have access to prosecutors evidence since it was under court order seal to present to the grand jury.....the mediot's who seem to be all on their high horse about what evidence Goodell should of had or seen, if it was so easy to obtain as the media thinks, why didn't the media get a hold of this video seven month's ago...if anything, the prosecutors are the ones that should be held accountable for their failure to fully prosecute both of these incidents, especially when there's video of Ray Rice knocking out his then Fiancee....
Your analogies are not even close to be apples to apples. More like apples to sledgehammers.
A similar case happened to Danny Heatley when he was driving at insane speeds with his friend Dan Snyder (no, not that one) and crashed Heatley's Ferrari which ended up killing Snyder. Heatley ended up spending NO time in jail because Snyder's family forgave Heatley and once again...Snyder got into the car with Heatley. And IIRC, they were able to give evidence that Snyder would often go in rides in Heatley's Ferrari and go at dangerous speeds.
So please...use your irrational logic to defend yourself...but, it's still not the law.
YR
YR
Don't understand why people discount this. If his own mother is forgiving him and wants him to have a good life....why can't we. Will never make sense to me.
I seriously hope you're kidding.
If that's all you got out of that, and you're going to completely ignore the fact that she came after him because he'd already struck her, then you've got a real serious problem.
Your analogies are not even close to be apples to apples. More like apples to sledgehammers.
A similar case happened to Danny Heatley when he was driving at insane speeds with his friend Dan Snyder (no, not that one) and crashed Heatley's Ferrari which ended up killing Snyder. Heatley ended up spending NO time in jail because Snyder's family forgave Heatley and once again...Snyder got into the car with Heatley. And IIRC, they were able to give evidence that Snyder would often go in rides in Heatley's Ferrari and go at dangerous speeds.
So please...use your irrational logic to defend yourself...but, it's still not the law.
YR
YR
unfortunately, the courts system do not work that way. A spouse forgives the other for beating him/her and do the D.A. and police dismiss? No. The law doesn't move in some respects no matter who forgives. Well, that is my understanding from watching the news and Matlock.