Plankton;5034018 said:
It's not giving him the contract that was the problem - it was the length, dollars and guaranteed money that was the issue.
Anyone who watched the way Barber ran knew that he was going to have a short shelf life as a player. Also, being that the RB position is fluid and specialized in today's NFL, paying big money to a RB is not a sound model to follow. Of course, there are exception cases, but very few of them.
Burm talked about the timing of when Dallas gave him the contract.
The length of the contract really doesn't matter since they aren't guaranteed. It is not like they ever thought he would be around the full 7 years.
He was guaranteed $16 million. Is that a lot? How does that compare to other guys?
The Cowboys had to sign him to something or he was going to walk. Perhaps they could have fought for a less expensive deal, but I don't think it would have been significantly less. And most people thought Dallas should sign Barber at the time.
The plan was never to have Barber carry the ball over 300 times a season. He was always going to split time in the backfield with someone. Dallas wasn't trying to put a heavy workload on Barber, so they never intended him to have a long shelf life. Perhaps get 4 productive years out of him out of the 7 years of the contract. Unfortunately it didn't work out that way.