JDSmith
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,273
- Reaction score
- 5,680
"With Elliott out of the game, the offense was a fraction of what it normally was" rings hollow with people who saw how we moved the ball early without Elliott. Depending on how many possessions we get, we were on a pace for 350-400 yards and 27-30 points without Elliott until the #3 QB came in. So it sounds like either you didn't watch the game all that closely, or you're simply not being objective.
Somebody's bound to point out that kind of thing, so don't be surprised or take offense when it happens. All part of the give and take.
Specifically, how did Dak do without Zeke in there? Don't use Romo to pad the stats - he's not going to play unless Dak gets hurt. You want to take out the third string QB because we sucked with him, but you want to put in the second string QB because he makes the offense look good. We were on pace for all of 12 points without Zeke and with Dak in there.