birdwells1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,837
- Reaction score
- 4,074
Before the NBA season started the Lakers did something that will probably set their franchise back about 5 years or so, they inexplicably signed Kobe Bryant to a 2 years extension on the average of about 25 million a year. I have a friend that's a die hard Lakers and Cowboys fan, so I called him to rib him a bit and all he could say was "I don't know what the h*** they're thinking".
Here what Mitch Kupchak said “We’ve said all along that our priority and hope was to have Kobe finish his career as a Laker, and this should ensure that that happens. To play 20 years in the NBA, and to do so with the same team, is unprecedented, and quite an accomplishment. Most importantly however, it assures us that one of the best players in the world will remain a Laker, bringing us excellent play and excitement for years to come.”
None of the above statement has any thing to do with winning which is what this organization has been about ever since I've been alive. Here's my question, if you're the Lakers why don't you say "hey we've had a great run with Kobe, we've won 5 World Championships with him and we're going to let his contract play out and build our team for another run".
I think the reason they signed Kobe is the same reason we still have Romo, because the Lakers are more about entertaining than winning. They still want to be relavent and with a "done" Kobe they think that they will still draw national tv audiences and stars courtside. If this were the Spurs they wouldn't have signed Kobe because they are all about winning.
The Dallas Cowboys let their 2 best dlineman walk this offseason (and I agree) and should be in a rebuilding mode but they still have Romo who really doesn't fit what this organization should be trying to do. The Cowboys know that with Romo come relavance, this season he may be the difference in this team going 4-12 and 7-9, and more importantly keeping the games entertaining. This is not a knock on Romo but he will not be the qb the next time this team rises to prominence, with the draft being deep at that position it would've been great to have the guy in place taking his lumps and getting on the same page with Dez, Williams, and Escobar.
While other teams like the Spurs and Patriots just worry about winning, teams like the Lakers and Cowboys worry about winning and style points. I asked my friend this question, if the Spurs and the Lakers switched jerseys and the Lakers won the championship in a "boring" manner, would the team be embraced by LA? Not surprising he said no.
Here what Mitch Kupchak said “We’ve said all along that our priority and hope was to have Kobe finish his career as a Laker, and this should ensure that that happens. To play 20 years in the NBA, and to do so with the same team, is unprecedented, and quite an accomplishment. Most importantly however, it assures us that one of the best players in the world will remain a Laker, bringing us excellent play and excitement for years to come.”
None of the above statement has any thing to do with winning which is what this organization has been about ever since I've been alive. Here's my question, if you're the Lakers why don't you say "hey we've had a great run with Kobe, we've won 5 World Championships with him and we're going to let his contract play out and build our team for another run".
I think the reason they signed Kobe is the same reason we still have Romo, because the Lakers are more about entertaining than winning. They still want to be relavent and with a "done" Kobe they think that they will still draw national tv audiences and stars courtside. If this were the Spurs they wouldn't have signed Kobe because they are all about winning.
The Dallas Cowboys let their 2 best dlineman walk this offseason (and I agree) and should be in a rebuilding mode but they still have Romo who really doesn't fit what this organization should be trying to do. The Cowboys know that with Romo come relavance, this season he may be the difference in this team going 4-12 and 7-9, and more importantly keeping the games entertaining. This is not a knock on Romo but he will not be the qb the next time this team rises to prominence, with the draft being deep at that position it would've been great to have the guy in place taking his lumps and getting on the same page with Dez, Williams, and Escobar.
While other teams like the Spurs and Patriots just worry about winning, teams like the Lakers and Cowboys worry about winning and style points. I asked my friend this question, if the Spurs and the Lakers switched jerseys and the Lakers won the championship in a "boring" manner, would the team be embraced by LA? Not surprising he said no.