I'm all in for Miller rather than misusing the #4 overall draft pick on the easiest position to acquire in football. You use it to get the most difficult position to acquire - a starting quarterback.
You can get a top running back in free agency.
You can't even get a mediocre one like Sam Bradford in free agency.
This is a great point -- but if the team believes Elliot will be an All-Pro RB, and that Goff will be a Chad Pennington type of player, you have to go Elliot. You don't need to draft a QB in the top 5 to find a franchise QB.
List of QB's selected 2nd-5th from 2000-2012: (not including Mariota/Bortles because jury is still out)
Robert Griffin III - 2nd
Mark Sanchez - 5th
Matt Ryan - 3rd
Vince Young - 3rd
Philip Rivers - 4th
Joey Harrington - 3rd
Love Rivers, Matt Ryan is alright.. but I'm not impressed in your odds of finding a stud in the top 5 outside of the #1 pick.
Current franchise QBs in the NFL:
Cam Newton: 1st pick
Andrew Luck: 1st pick
Peyton Manning: 1st pick
Carson Palmer: 1st pick
Peyton Manning: 1st pick
Philip Rivers: 4th pick
Ben Roethlisberger: 11th pick
Aaron Rodgers: 24th overall
Drew Brees: 2nd rounder
Russell Wilson: 3rd rounder
Tom Brady: 6th rounder
Tony Romo: undrafted
I think it is ill advised to say drafting a QB at 4 is better value than drafting another player that you believe in. Not saying Elliot should be the pick, it should be whoever the Best Player Available is based on our scouts or a trade down. Whether this is a QB, RB, WR, OL, DL, LB, DB, that is OK. We should not pick a QB just because we are #4 and we will not have a better opportunity to select a QB in the future. We need to pick the guy that our scouts believe will become an All-Pro in this league.