SultanOfSix;1935962 said:
ROFLMAO. You and Nors must be the same person.
Your argument is vacuous, because what JJ did wasn't illegal, nor was it considered cheating by the NFL, nor was it like what Bellicheat did. But, let's not let facts get in the way of your Cheats defending agenda.
ooooo! "Vacuous."
We're pulling out the $5 words now.
First, you are making an argument about "cheating" not that it was illegal. We already know it was illegal, according to NFL policy. And based on the policy, they were punished. But you don't like the punishment so you continue to call them cheaters. You are focusing on their
ACTION not the policy.
Well, if that's the case, then the Cowboys cheated also.
Second, if you're going to talk about illegalities, then that disqualifies the Cowboys even more so because Hollywood Henderson admitted to taking drugs during the Cowboys Super Bowl years. So, by your argument, the Cowboys benefited from a cheater, i.e., a man who was doped up while playing.
Moreover, we know that Michael Irvin had a drug problem - during his years with the Cowboys. It was just kept under wraps until Jimmy Johnson left. And you do know taking drugs is illegal, both according to NFL policy and the laws of this land, right?
So if you want to make a big about
illegal all of the Cowboys Super Bowl wins had an element of illegality to them, no matter how you want to look at it.
Pulease. That's what happens when people become self-righteous, they invite scrutiny upon themselves and expose their own faults.
The Cowboys were as guilty as any other franchise in terms of illegality, if we use your selective definition. They benefited from wins by playing players who
KNOWINGLY violated the rules of the NFL.
Here's a stone. Aim it in the direction of your own glass house.