- Messages
- 101,827
- Reaction score
- 112,698
He did end up with 840 yards receiving last year.
Something 36 WR's topped.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2015/receiving.htm
Not a WR1. A WR2 and nothing more. Like I said.
He did end up with 840 yards receiving last year.
Is not excuses its fact. Without Rice and Montana/Young do they still win 5?
Something 36 WR's topped.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2015/receiving.htm
Not a WR1. A WR2 and nothing more. Like I said.
We're it an option, I would have given you two likes.
Also why we signed Alfred Morris. 3rd and short is his down to pound.One of the reasons Dallas drafted Ezekiel Elliott was to make sure the offense stayed on the field. As we’ve mentioned hundreds of times this off-season, the idea is simple; keep the aging quarterback from taking hits, keep the defense on the sidelines and sustain drives that end in points. The team floundered on that plan in 2015 because they couldn’t keep the offense on the field. The result was the defense had to play too many snaps on the season and couldn’t get stops when they needed them...
Also why we signed Alfred Morris. 3rd and short is his down to pound.
Here's another dimension opened up:
Third Down Efficiency Needs A Boost
Posted on May 23, 2016 by Ben Grimaldi 6 Comments
http://cowboyszone.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2015/09/Jason-Witten-and-Terrance-Williams-celebrate-300x200.jpg
http://cowboyszone.com/2016/05/third-down-efficiency-needs-a-boost.html
The Dallas Cowboys weren’t a very good team last season, no one can dispute that. Pick a category and the Cowboys struggled, third-down efficiency was no different.
In 2014, the offense was one of the best in the NFL at converting on third downs. Last season, not so much. The Cowboys ranked second in the league in 2014, converting at 47.09 percent. Dallas dipped dramatically last year, falling to 26th in the league, successful just 34.55 percent of the time.
Some of the reasons why are obvious; no Tony Romo and no Dez Bryant meant playing behind the chains, something the offense couldn’t overcome without their best players on the field. The Cowboys were also extremely successful on the short-yardage situations in 2014 with DeMarco Murray, something they failed on in too many occasions last year. Starting running backs Darren McFadden and Joseph Randle were not able to prolong drives like Murray had and drives stalled far too often.
One of the reasons Dallas drafted Ezekiel Elliott was to make sure the offense stayed on the field. As we’ve mentioned hundreds of times this off-season, the idea is simple; keep the aging quarterback from taking hits, keep the defense on the sidelines and sustain drives that end in points. The team floundered on that plan in 2015 because they couldn’t keep the offense on the field. The result was the defense had to play too many snaps on the season and couldn’t get stops when they needed them...
Bleacher Report. Everyone please disregard
Those guys being injured should mean that the other players step up their own contributions, not disappear like they did.
Nobody is expecting a Super Bowl after those injuries, but they're not expecting a disappearing offense either.
Again when you take out your Pro bowl QB and all pro WR you are going to struggle. It's not excuses its fact, you can take any teams number 1 WR and QB and their offense stumbles as well.
You take Eli and Odell out and bet giants winning 2-4 games. .....maybe. Nassib to Cruz will not set the league in fire
I just don't believe in TWill. I think if we replace him with Anquan Boldin, then that's a WR Corp that gives defenses real problems.
I know he's a progress stopper, but I don't see TWill progress anyway. So let's go win a super bowl with AB and draft a new WR next year.
I'm not denying that. An offense would definitely struggle. But that's when the role players need to step up their game and carry a bigger part of the offense, not disappear like these guys did.
And this team won 1 game without those players and even that was a gift from a boneheaded Desean Jackson play.
The team needed players to step up, and instead they got players who shrank away from the challenge.
Rank them wherever you like because there is no one right answer. The dynamics between passing and receiving take a couple of years to develop. Last year we lost our no. 1 receiver and our No.1 QB so it forces everyone to step up their game, except they had to adjust to a carousel of 4 different QB's. It's hard enough to get the timing down with everyone on board.
Williams is a solid number 2 and probably nothing more, considering Witten is actually the no. 2. Butler is likely a number 2 with upside, and with a full year with Romo he will take the path of Robinson to a multi year deal and thank Romo on his way out the door. Unless we keep him in favor of Williams. Beasley simply moves the chains which somehow is often overlooked. Street is the progress stopper.
You have Dez, Witten, and Beasley to move the chains and Dez, Williams, and Butler to make the big plays. If everyone stays healthy then I can see top 5. You can lose your top player and everyone can step up, but when you lose both the top QB and your top WR there is just too much to overcome.
Step...step...step...step, and in the plant keep hose pressure at 116 pounds off the truck.