Lions Cut KR/PR/WR Drummond: Should Dallas Take A Look? *Merge*

Messages
27,093
Reaction score
0
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070824/SPORTS01/708240367/1049

Lions cut Drummond; Walters, Cason and McDonald can return kicks, punts

August 24, 2007
BY NICHOLAS J. COTSONIKA
FREE PRESS SPORTS WRITER
After practice Thursday, Eddie Drummond was summoned to the Lions' front office and told he was being released. He turned in his playbook, then stopped by the coaches' offices to say good-bye.
"It's only a business, and I've got to look at it like that," Drummond said in a phone interview later in the afternoon. "It wasn't a sudden thing that just caught me off-guard. It's been a little bit up and down ever since this year started."
Advertisement
OAS_AD('ArticleFlex_1');
61396338643732323436636564623430
After signing as an undrafted free agent out of Penn State in 2002, Drummond became a return specialist. He was often injured, but at times he was the Lions' most electric player. He went to the Pro Bowl after the '04 season. Despite playing only 11 games, he became the second NFL player to return two kickoffs and two punts for touchdowns in a season.

But Drummond hasn't stood out the same way since, and he has never found a role on offense. The Lions have players who do double duty. Wide receiver Troy Walters returns kicks and punts. Running back Aveion Cason returns kicks; wide receiver Shaun McDonald returns punts.
"I expected something to happen just because I wasn't getting an opportunity to compete with the rest of the receivers, and I know some of the coaches didn't like just special teams players," Drummond said. "It was kind of obvious that something was going to end up happening."
The irony is that Drummond, 27, stayed in Detroit as a free agent last year because the Lions had hired Mike Martz as their offensive coordinator. Drummond, 5-feet-9, 190 pounds, thought he could fill the role of the small, speedy receiver Martz had used so successfully in St. Louis.
Martz praised Drummond's play at receiver during training camp last year, saying he was "very, very pleased." But after catching a pass in each of the first two regular-season games, Drummond didn't catch one in the third. Then he didn't play offense anymore. He was responsible for knowing multiple receiver positions, and he didn't execute to Martz's standards.
"He had very high expectations for me when he came in," Drummond said. "Everything was actually in line. It was perfect. I was actually his guy in preseason and in training camp last year. I played the first three games, I believe, and then after the third game ...
"Made a couple of mistakes in that game, and I haven't really seen the field since the third game of the season last year."
The timing of Drummond's release gives him a better chance to land another job. Drummond said he expected to sign elsewhere soon and he had heard Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Tampa Bay and Denver were interested.
As a Lion, Drummond averaged 23.6 yards returning kicks and 9.8 returning punts. He had six touchdowns.
"It's been a good six years here, 5 1/2 years here, in Detroit," Drummond said. "Hopefully I've brought a lot of excitement to the city. I'm not totally out of Detroit. I bought a condo here. So I'm going to be coming in here and visiting and everything like that. Six years in a place, you've got a lot invested in it."
 

cobra

Salty *******
Messages
3,134
Reaction score
0
ThreeSportStar80;1602625 said:
Sam Hurd...
Hurd?

Why Hurd? He looks like a good developing young player. Don't know how you could be down on the kid.

I don't know enough about Drummond to even comment on whether we get him. But if they need to cut a WR, I'd drop Austin.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
Cut one just took take a look?

Let's see there is Jefferson, Raab, Richardson......

Bring him in most definately
 

DCBoysfan

Hardwork and Dedication
Messages
7,279
Reaction score
3,582
No, I think we Pass we have some young WR talent that can do what Drummond did.
 
Messages
27,093
Reaction score
0
Yeagermeister;1602651 said:
Cut one just took take a look?

Let's see there is Jefferson, Raab, Richardson......

Bring him in most definately


I'm thinking from a 53 man roster standpoint, Jefferson, Raab and Richardson won't make the team...

Drummond is relatively young though, he's still got major moves and speed, he would definitely ignite the PR and KR units and he's a deep threat down the field as a WR... I could live with him replacing a guy like Tyson Thompson or Hurd...
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
ThreeSportStar80;1602667 said:
I'm thinking from a 53 man roster standpoint, Jefferson, Raab and Richardson won't make the team...

Drummond is relatively young though, he's still got major moves and speed, he would definitely ignite the PR and KR units and he's a deep threat down the field as a WR... I could live with him replacing a guy like Tyson Thompson or Hurd...

If we brought in Drummond it would mean the end of the road for Austin most likely.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Yeagermeister;1602699 said:
If we brought in Drummond it would mean the end of the road for Austin most likely.

I would agree. Thus far Austin has not had the pre-season I was hoping for. He like the others have a couple more games or at least 1 more to turn things around.
 
Messages
27,093
Reaction score
0
I don't believe Dallas is willing to part with such a young talent as Austin, he's got some very good physical tools... Tyson Thompson isn't going to take away snaps from J. Jones or MBIII so Eddie Drummond would be a definitely upgrade because he can handle both KR and PR duties along with providing another deep threat in the passing game!
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
ThreeSportStar80;1602726 said:
I don't Dallas is willing to part with such a young talent as Austin, he's got some very good physical tools... Tyson Thompson isn't going to take away snaps from J. Jones or MBIII so Eddie Drummond would be a definitely upgrade because he can handle both KR and PR duties along with providing another deep threat in the passing game!

But Drummond is not a RB. Chances are Dallas will keep 3 RB on the team so if they have to make room for Drummond it would be from the WR spot.
 

MichaelWinicki

"You want some?"
Staff member
Messages
47,997
Reaction score
27,917
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
No.

We already have too many young WR's. Thompson and Austin are both capable KO returners. I'm not big on Crayton as a PR but Newman is available if needed.
 
Messages
27,093
Reaction score
0
MichaelWinicki;1602734 said:
No.

We already have too many young WR's. Thompson and Austin are both capable KO returners. I'm not big on Crayton as a PR but Newman is available if needed.

Think about what you are saying here, Newman should not be returning punts, especially with a sore heel/foot. Crayton is too careless with the ball back there and doesn't have the quickness or speed... I believe Drummond would solve a problem the Cowboys have had for a while. Return game need!
 

JIMMYBUFFETT

Skinwalker
Messages
3,466
Reaction score
5,717
I wouldn't mind , but not at the expense of one of our young receivers or backs . Maybe if Dallas carries only one kicker and they had room for him . He'd have to be a gunner too though and play every snap on special teams before I'd have interest . I don't really understand why Dallas hasn't had Stanback fielding more punts . I'd tell Crayton he was done and to concentrate on WR only . Stanback would field every punt that went in the air .
 

cobra

Salty *******
Messages
3,134
Reaction score
0
ThreeSportStar80;1602726 said:
I don't Dallas is willing to part with such a young talent as Austin

But you think they will part with Hurd? So does that mean you think Austin is better/more promising than Hurd?

Why is that?

I think the consensus is that Hurd brings much more to the table than Austin (which is why he has been starting and is higher on the depth chart).
 
Messages
27,093
Reaction score
0
cobra;1602752 said:
But you think they will part with Hurd? So does that mean you think Austin is better/more promising than Hurd?

Why is that?

I think the consensus is that Hurd brings much more to the table than Austin (which is why he has been starting and is higher on the depth chart).

Players develop at different paces... I believe Austin's upside is way higher than Hurds, just my opinion.
 

JonJon

Injured Reserve
Messages
11,262
Reaction score
733
ThreeSportStar80;1602760 said:
Players develop at different paces... I believe Austin's upside is way higher than Hurds, just my opinion.

IMO, I doubt Austin ever cracks the lineup as a WR. Even if Owens and Glenn go down, he is still behind Crayton and Hurd as receivers, and he will soon be replaced by Stanback on the depth chart. His return skills aren't really all that great either. He is a fantastic athlete, but that doesn't always transfer onto the football field. Drummond is still young and if he can provide more to the team than Austin, I have no problem letting him go for Drummond.
 

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
He's not the return man he once was so way bring him in. Just wait and see how Stanbach develops. Maybe by mid season he'll be able to take over that job. BTW: I know Thompson and Austin return kicks but why can't we also use one of them to return punts. After all Austin never returned kicks in his life until midseason of last year. Oh well, we'll see if Urban or Rector (if he can get healthy) can return punts.
 
Top