stasheroo;2023268 said:
I agree.
Unless they would lose their ability to recoup bonus money by trading him.
And if that's the case, why didn't they think of this before?
If I was a betting man (and I am actually), I would think Jerry said we'll give you a solid sixth rounder and *insert trade bait player's name* no matter what happens. The Titans said, no, keep it, we would rather have a conditional (if he gets playing time) 3rd rounder. Jerry said, I'll give you a 5th and the player above, the titans countered saying they'd do that if Jerry bought out the bonus (which basically means taking all or part of the cap hit on and actually paying the Titans the amount). There is a precedent for this, the Bears bought out $5M of Archuleta's bonus last year.
I understand where both are coming from. Jerry thinks if I'm willing to risk something and the titans make out no matter what happens, it's worth it. The titans want conditional compensation saying if Pacman can actually contribute, they want fair compensation for that contribution. If he can't, they don't mind getting considerably less. Just my view of the situation.