Logan Wilson?

He’s pretty old now and has lost at least one step. He also can’t cover well, at all.

I wouldn’t trade for him. Especially not in a year when we will likely be below .500
 
You got your wish, big upgrade over whoever we were fielding.
 
Kwyn said:
He’s pretty old now and has lost at least one step. He also can’t cover well, at all.

I wouldn’t trade for him. Especially not in a year when we will likely be below .500
Click to expand...
Respect you bro, but your reconaissance drones failed to deliver you the goods on Wilson. He's a very good cover LB. And the price was almost nothing.

Hawkeye dominated this thread.
 
T-RO said:
Respect you bro, but your reconaissance drones failed to deliver you the goods on Wilson. He's a very good cover LB. And the price was almost nothing.
Click to expand...
Several bengals fans have been commenting through the season that while once was a good cover LB, he had struggled with it this year and that was one of the reasons he was benched.

I could have not gathered enough recon, but is it possible you’re tapping into old data?
 
I'm getting old, Kwyn. Many things are possible, especially when I'm posting after a few drinks, past my expiration hour.

While I like to merge PFF scores and data over the most recent two seasons for more balanced evaluation...When I double-check my data on Wilson I see that perhaps he's not as good in coverage as I'd reported a moment ago. In truth: this time I was winging it, w/out my data.

You get a partial win, this time. Relish it while you can as we shall meet again soon, sabers in hand. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 18,670 (members: 97, guests: 18,573)
Robots: 904

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,041
Messages
14,508,680
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top