The other backs are/were better prospects, imo. It takes more than being a stud to justify a top 5 pick at RB, imo.
So what would it take than being a study running back? Are you supposed to be a stud player to be taken in the top of the draft?
I don't think RBs are in general. That doesn't mean I'm going to cling to that as gospel and not question it when very special players come along. That list for me is Adrian Peterson, to this point, since I've been following the draft this closely. Gurley looked to have that promise, but had too much injury risk. Fournette looks like he could at this point in the process too, but needs another strong year. That's it - 1x yes, 1x would have been, and 1x might be - in over a decade. I know I can't can't confirm this as I wasn't posting here, but I was against Richardson being a top 5 pick at the time as well. I'd add Bush to the list, as I did think he was going to be worth a top 5 pick, but I expected a lot of his value to come outside of the traditional RB role.
Do you think another team would have drafted Emmitt Smith if they knew what we do now about his ability, talent and career?
Second, I can understand the value argument, i.e., that you shouldn't take a running back at the top of the draft because running backs are a dime a dozen and you can get a good one lower. But I don't understand the difference in drafting an Adrian Peterson or a Todd Gurley and an Ezekiel Elliott. Okay, maybe AP does have better speed than AP, but EE has a better job of holding onto the ball than AP did. And EE is a better overall back than Gurley.
I don't know if the differences are all that much to say, "Well, we should draft AP and Gurley in the top 5 but not Elliott." If there are differences, they're really negligible as far as what they do on the field.
EE has shown he is capable of breaking long runs to the house. He's shown he can run between the tackles. He's shown that he can hold on to the football. He has shown he can catch the ball out of the backfield and he has shown he can block and protect the quarterback.
He has shown he can do everything you need a top back the caliber of Adrian Peterson and a healthy Todd Gurley can do. Again, if there are any differences, they're negligible.