Man Sues Police To Get His Porn Back

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
Man Sues Police to Get His Porn Back

SAN RAFAEL, Calif. (AP) - A man recently released from jail after being convicted of secretly videotaping a woman and a teenage girl has sued a Marin County police department for the return of a massive porn collection taken during the investigation. Dennis Saunders, 59, filed suit against San Rafael police in Marin County Superior Court after the department refused to give back some 500 pornographic movies and 250 magazines his lawyer described as unrelated to the peeping case.

"There's absolutely no legal foundation for them withholding perfectly legal adult-oriented material," Tiburon attorney Jon Rankin said.

The video collection alone was likely worth at least $10,000, Rankin said.

Saunders, of Healdsburg, was arrested in 2002 and charged with taping the women in their homes at a San Rafael apartment complex where he worked. He was released last month.

A lawyer representing the city said authorities wanted direction from a judge on whether it would be "lawful or appropriate" to return the material to Saunders, who has a history of peeping-related arrests dating back to 1979, "If the court orders us to give it back to him, we will give it back to him," city lawyer Thomas Bertrand said.
 

Mavs Man

All outta bubble gum
Messages
4,672
Reaction score
0
Sounds like a stand-up joke:

"If you have so much porn that you need a card catalog system to keep it in order, you may have a problem."
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
theogt;1621130 said:
Man Sues Police to Get His Porn Back

SAN RAFAEL, Calif. (AP) - A man recently released from jail after being convicted of secretly videotaping a woman and a teenage girl has sued a Marin County police department for the return of a massive porn collection taken during the investigation. Dennis Saunders, 59, filed suit against San Rafael police in Marin County Superior Court after the department refused to give back some 500 pornographic movies and 250 magazines his lawyer described as unrelated to the peeping case.

"There's absolutely no legal foundation for them withholding perfectly legal adult-oriented material," Tiburon attorney Jon Rankin said.

The video collection alone was likely worth at least $10,000, Rankin said.

Saunders, of Healdsburg, was arrested in 2002 and charged with taping the women in their homes at a San Rafael apartment complex where he worked. He was released last month.

A lawyer representing the city said authorities wanted direction from a judge on whether it would be "lawful or appropriate" to return the material to Saunders, who has a history of peeping-related arrests dating back to 1979, "If the court orders us to give it back to him, we will give it back to him," city lawyer Thomas Bertrand said.

I hope you get your pron back :D
 

Doomsday

Rising Star
Messages
20,225
Reaction score
16,868
I think they might need me to go through the evidence piece by piece to determine which items he should get back.
 

Crown Royal

Insulin Beware
Messages
14,229
Reaction score
6,383
bbgun;1621220 said:
I feel his pain.


Considering he just got out of jail on a sexual misconduct charge with a lot of burly angry criminals, I don't think you want to go around saying 'you feel his pain.'

Right now, his pain is in a place you NEVER want to feel pain.
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
25,369
Reaction score
8,142
Doomsday;1621209 said:
I think they might need me to go through the evidence piece by piece to determine which items he should get back.

Me thinks they are already doing so ;) Kind of like when the police raid a drug house and take x grams but when the matter goes to trial it is x-5 etc ;)
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
He has been convicted of sex crimes- so why should he get anything like that back? I would make him watch as it was all burned.
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
25,369
Reaction score
8,142
burmafrd;1623199 said:
He has been convicted of sex crimes- so why should he get anything like that back? I would make him watch as it was all burned.

Is peeping really a sex crime? I don't know. It is creepy but it didn't say he ever assaulted anyone sexually.

As long as the tapes are not of kiddie porn, let him have them.

A little porn never hurt nobody ;)
 

ROMOSAPIEN9

Proud Grandpa
Messages
2,251
Reaction score
1
I am one sick and depraved individual, but I really have never gotten into pron. Just not my thing I guess.
 

dallas_112678

New Member
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
burmafrd;1623199 said:
He has been convicted of sex crimes- so why should he get anything like that back? I would make him watch as it was all burned.

If they take his porn then he'll just go get his "needs fullfilled" the same ways that got him thrown in prison the first place, hell if he has no porn to tide him over he'll prolly do something worse next time.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,648
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
CanadianCowboysFan;1623368 said:
Is peeping really a sex crime? I don't know. It is creepy but it didn't say he ever assaulted anyone sexually.

As long as the tapes are not of kiddie porn, let him have them.

A little porn never hurt nobody ;)
Think it depends on what you're into, I imagine.
 

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
convicted of VIDEOTAPING women/girls in THEIR home. Sounds like he was trying for something more then being a peeping tom. Was that not breaking and entering as well? Take away his porn. Same thing he was arrested for.
Why am I not suprised at who thinks there is nothing wrong with this?
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
burmafrd;1629297 said:
convicted of VIDEOTAPING women/girls in THEIR home. Sounds like he was trying for something more then being a peeping tom. Was that not breaking and entering as well? Take away his porn. Same thing he was arrested for.
Why am I not suprised at who thinks there is nothing wrong with this?

I would bet dude was just standing outside of a window w/ a digital camera

noone is saying nothing's wrong here, just a sex-crime is where you violate an individual, or intend to, this is called voyeurism, not a sex-crime
 
Top