neosapien23
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,897
- Reaction score
- 161
If both these guys make it to the 18th pick, who do you want the boys to draft?
neosapien23 said:If both these guys make it to the 18th pick, who do you want the boys to draft?
neosapien23 said:If both these guys make it to the 18th pick, who do you want the boys to draft?
kartr said:Neither. We need Brod Bunkley, dt from FSU. He's a top pass rusher, could be Glover's replacement. There are plenty of quaility RT in draft on day one and two.
ABQCOWBOY said:Asked this the other day. Why do you feel we need a 3 Technique DT for our 34?
ABQCOWBOY said:Asked this the other day. Why do you feel we need a 3 Technique DT for our 34?
ya just what we need. a gigantic reach in thefirst, for a guy who doesnt fit our scheme. genius, I should expect nothing less from you.kartr said:Neither. We need Brod Bunkley, dt from FSU. He's a top pass rusher, could be Glover's replacement. There are plenty of quaility RT in draft on day one and two.
jbsg02 said:manny lawson won't go round 1
you never know what the combine will do. he could easily slide into the first with a great combine, players do it every year.jbsg02 said:manny lawson won't go round 1
Hiero said:you never know what the combine will do. he could easily slide into the first with a great combine, players do it every year.
junk said:Same reason you think QC was a good QB?
I think McNeill could fill in at LT. Better fit at RT but could do LT if injuries occur.dwmyers said:I don't think we should be looking for a tackle who can only plug one position.
All it would take is Flo to bust up a tendon again and we're back in a version of this year's situation. We need a lineman who can play both sides, RT and LT, even if we target him for RT.
IMO, versatility is something we need if we draft another tackle.
David.