Marcellus Wiley

sportsman

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,034
Reaction score
497
licking his chops against the Boys. Surely even our OL will not give up a sack to him.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
sportsman said:
licking his chops against the Boys. Surely even our OL will not give up a sack to him.

Maybe they will give him a Tom Thumb paper sack to put whats left of his career in... :lmao2:
 

Juke99

...Abbey someone
Messages
22,279
Reaction score
126
This might have been the worst signing in the history of the franchise.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
Juke99 said:
This might have been the worst signing in the history of the franchise.

Not really. He's actually made their roster two years in a row now. That should tell you something about the quality of their DEs.


Nevermind, thought you were referring to the Jags franchise.


Yeah he was a horrible signing, but not the worst.
 

Crown Royal

Insulin Beware
Messages
14,229
Reaction score
6,383
Juke99 said:
This might have been the worst signing in the history of the franchise.


Hahaha - I doubt it. Galloway was probably worse, as we gave up waaaay mre for him.

I was for the Wiley signing - I thought he would do well here, and I can see the logic in grabbing him. But we didn't break the bank and we quickly cut our losses. There were plenty of things wrong with 2004, and Wiley wasn't even the worst thing about that year.

The NON-SIGNING of DBs was more painful than SIGNING Wiley.
 

Juke99

...Abbey someone
Messages
22,279
Reaction score
126
Rack said:
Not really. He's actually made their roster two years in a row now. That should tell you something about the quality of their DEs.


Nevermind, thought you were referring to the Jags franchise.


Yeah he was a horrible signing, but not the worst.

Well, he's gotta be a "top five" in the all time worst signings...

I think we've been much worse in our Jerry Jones drafts than we were in Free Agent signings. That's why I put Wiley at the top of the list.
 

Juke99

...Abbey someone
Messages
22,279
Reaction score
126
Crown Royal said:
Hahaha - I doubt it. Galloway was probably worse, as we gave up waaaay mre for him.

I was for the Wiley signing - I thought he would do well here, and I can see the logic in grabbing him. But we didn't break the bank and we quickly cut our losses. There were plenty of things wrong with 2004, and Wiley wasn't even the worst thing about that year.

The NON-SIGNING of DBs was more painful than SIGNING Wiley.

Well, Galloway was a horrible trade.

I was thinking of FA signings.
 

parchy

Active Member
Messages
2,256
Reaction score
3
Dat Dude!

I still can't believe he was in the blue and silver.
 

rlgiv

Member
Messages
199
Reaction score
2
Danny Noonan was a draft pick. That Eddie George and Anthony Thomas Signing was pretty bad as well.
 

k19

Active Member
Messages
2,968
Reaction score
18
Quentin Coryatt

nuff said

Dat DUD last years stats......

11 games 6 tackles 0 sacks
 

Cbz40

The Grand Poobah
Messages
31,387
Reaction score
39
Juke99 said:
This might have been the worst signing in the history of the franchise.


"might have been".......No doubt it was. ;)
 

JVita17

Benched
Messages
1,340
Reaction score
2
is everyone forgetting the power blue draft bust turn silver and blue free agent bust....Ryan Leaf?!?!
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
JVita17 said:
is everyone forgetting the power blue draft bust turn silver and blue free agent bust....Ryan Leaf?!?!

He cost next to nothing for Dallas. Not a bad signing at all. Not a great signing either. Dallas just left themselves with little good options at QB that season.

Anthony Thomas was not a bad signing either. He did not cost that much. Now the contract Eddie George received was dumb. It was clear that he did not have it to be a starter. Some will say he was just brought in to back up Julius and was forced to start. Well, he got paid more than a back up of his caliber is worth. Bad signing.

I don't think Coryatt got that much money either.

Bryant Westbrook was a bad signing. Actually, I thought he was a good risk when they signed him. Then when he struggled in camp and pre-season,he should have been cut. He proved to not be worth the gamble. Instead they decided to keep him for the season opener, which guranteed his contract. Then they cut him after that game. They turned a decent low risk signing into a bad signing.
 
Top