Mcfadden gone if we draft Zeke?

Floatyworm

The Labeled One
Messages
25,982
Reaction score
23,904
Could save 2 million dollars???? We know how Jerry likes to save money

 
I'd dump 'Damaged Goods' Dunbar and his $1.25 million contract long before I'd think about cutting McFadden.

If people are 'moving down a seat' to accommodate Elliott, I'm dropping the guy that's hurt all the time and giving McFadden his third down role. At least McFadden can play some running back too..
 
I'd dump 'Damaged Goods' Dunbar and his $1.25 million contract long before I'd think about cutting McFadden.

If people are 'moving down a seat' to accommodate Elliott, I'm dropping the guy that's hurt all the time and giving McFadden his third down role. At least McFadden can play some running back too..

And block.
 
$2 million is chump change. No. He will and should remain.
 
It's pretty likely. $2M is a lot for a backup RB on the last year of a cheap deal. Morris was basically insurance against that.

We don't really have a RB who gives us ST plays right now with any of these scenarios. Another reason why it makes sense to pass on Zeke and take a guy in the 3rd or 4th who gives you both RB snaps and ST coverage.
 
I doubt it.

McfAdden is a great 3rd down back.

Alfred Morris is 1 dimensional and Dunbar is coming off a major season ending injury.
 
If Zeke is drafted at 4 or if they draft a RB in the second round, I can't imagine going into the season with a high pick and both McFadden and Morris. They probably bring both to camp but would release or trade for a conditional draft pick prior to the season if there was no injury.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,041
Messages
14,508,707
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top