Texas_Pete
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,752
- Reaction score
- 15,777
Comments from Broaddus:
LINK: http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/2014/12/26/final-thoughts-coping-“zero”-coverage-shifting-defensive-front
Maybe Melton is not really healthy? If he is and they still inactivate him that says a lot.
Red wants "more snaps" for Brent. I am looking forward to seeing him keep our LBs clean v. Skins and shut Morris down.
I am going to be interested to see who is inactive between Josh Brent and Henry Melton this week. Earlier on Friday, Garrett was asked what he needed to see from Brent and his reply was “more snaps.” With the way the Commanders like to run the ball with Alfred Morris, the idea might be to have a bigger body at the point of attack instead of the lighter Melton. There were some whispers even before Brent was ready for action that it was Melton’s spot that could be in question. With Terrell McClain, the coaches have to flexibility to play him at either the under-tackle or nose, so that will protect them in case they want to sit Melton.
LINK: http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/2014/12/26/final-thoughts-coping-“zero”-coverage-shifting-defensive-front
Maybe Melton is not really healthy? If he is and they still inactivate him that says a lot.
Red wants "more snaps" for Brent. I am looking forward to seeing him keep our LBs clean v. Skins and shut Morris down.
Last edited by a moderator: