DeaconMoss
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,392
- Reaction score
- 7,302
Crawford does need to be resigned and we need to get on the phone with Coples
Draft is not deep on DE's and there are only so many holes that can be filled by the draft, especially considering our track record.
Jack Crawford is a valuable rotation player. We need rotation depth, so he becomes important. We still won't overpay him, but I'm shocked he hasn't gotten an offer from somebody. He'd be a good value on a small deal.
We should be using FA to find and sign as many Jack Crawfords as possible. Those guys are out there, if you look hard enough. The fact that we've got one still unsigned suggests a couple other teams do, too. Then develop stars via the draft where we can.
Bring Hardy back for cheap and keep it moving...
Crawford does need to be resigned and we need to get on the phone with Coples
The first 4 games, who is playing DE right now? Russel? Boatright?
So basically, with arguably our greatest need being pass rush this offseason, we are left scrambling to grab a guy like Andre Branch or Jones who might be able to bring " a little" pass rush.
Their best option of even having an average pass rush this year is re-sign Hardy. And they won't do that. So slice it anyway you want, they have failed to fix a need that they stressed was very important.
Oh and thinking the draft solves the pass rush problem is fool's gold.
Yep. Our whole season depended on Chris Long.
They do. This is a league built on dime-a-dozen players. Young DLs who can play four spots along the line and get pressure are normally in demand.
I'm not saying Jack Crawford is special, or that he's better than he really is. I'm realistic about him. But he was the free agent on our team I thought was maybe most likely to go somewhere on a deal we would have thought excessive in that first week of FA, and so far, we haven't heard of any interest in him from anybody.
24 tackles and 4 sacks in last 2 seasons. Neither of which he played all 16 games. Over 30. Next....
And that tells me that either he's not well-regarded outside Dallas (like most of the re-signings), or that he thinks he's worth more than everyone else does.
I sure don't want to hear people cheering if Jack Crawford comes back on a deal paying him $2 - $3 million a year. That's no bargain for a rotational player.
Remember the day when if we wanted a FA he was here. Not so much because of the money, but everybody wants to play on a winner, well.......
I think the latter with Crawford.
Though I don't agree that most of our players aren't well regarded outside Dallas. They're mid-roster guys, but they're getting attention. In some cases they're getting better offers and still electing to stay here.
24 tackles and 4 sacks in last 2 seasons. Neither of which he played all 16 games. Over 30. Next....
So there in a serious bind at DE when there's an upcoming draft full of quality DEs