Zimmy Lives
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,165
- Reaction score
- 4,631
Take the pay cut, B. It will be better than any offers you get if you are out in the market.
The only way the team can get Carr to take a pay cut this year is if they extend his contract and convert a port of his base salary into a signing bonus. Players don't accept pay cuts in the last year of their deals.
They will offer 5-6 million. He's a starting CB. The only way they can offer him an even larger cut is to let him test the market first and hope no one offers him starter's pay.
A CB who has not had a single interception in 2 seasons and whose claim to fame is that he shows up for work is not a #2 CB
I disagree. Lack of Int is also reflection of entire D. I don't even know who is our leader in INT for the past two years? I think it may have been a LB. He's not a bad player just overpaid and people need to get over that. If we can't replace him then what? sign another CB to big contract? which starting CB that we really want will play for 2-3 million per year.....if so they must have an awful agent.
What message does it send to him, and all of his teammates, if we keep bringing back players who under perform?
He under performed his contract, yet. But the expectation was so high there was no way he would have ever live up to it. It's the FO's fault that we gave him that contract.
Time to just let the past be bygones and face reality. If we can extend him a year and average his contract to $3 ish million per for remainder of his 3 years then we should do that. Going into off season looking for 2 new starting CBs is poor management of our roster and draft. If we can get better front 4 play he will be fine as a second CB.
Moore's right here. Carr's a second CB who's getting paid like a first. But we don't want to be replacing two starting CBs in the offseason. That just means overpaying for somebody else--two somebodies--and hoping you get both right.
Either Carr takes his cut (and I believe he will) or we take a bigger risk and try to find an accommodation for Claiborn, which is riskier.
Moore is wrong Dallas never approached Carr for a paycutI think Moore is on target here. He is likely to be approached by the FO with an offer to take less or depart. This isn't anything new, since he refused to accept it in the past. If he does so once again, he'll be leaving.
we expect Scandrick back, so in essence we'll replace only one starter. Claiborne was a starter by default
How does he win? If he says no, and they keep him, he wins. If he says no, and they cut him, he probably will go someone and get a little guaranteed money and a short term contract, he wins.
So is a #1 cornerbacks quality based on how many INT's he gets? Because Jonathan Joseph had 1 interception last season. Malcolm Butler had 2. Richard Sherman had 2....Pat Peterson had 2........now I'm not confusing Carr with any of these guys.....but I just see the consistent trend of how many picks Carr has had in order to determine he's a terrible corner. There's a little bit more to it. Brandon Carr is more of the norm in this league at corner then he is a Jacque Reeves. I think the minute we realize how good or bad corner is in this league the more realistic we'll be about finding one.
Carr either needs to be on another or team or at a pay cut next season. That's clear. But let's also be clear that no matter who you replace him with that person is going to be as good/or bad as Carr was last season.