Where's the "B.S." emoticon?Teague31;1071036 said:The article basically calls him a bigger, faster LT.
No we didn't. They got moved to the NFL Zone.Doomsday;1071040 said:Well done we made it until Thursday night before a Ware vs Merriman thread this week, good job.
hmcorp;1071102 said:merriman with the bone crushing hit as todd heap lands in the end zone for the winning touchdown but man DIDNT MERRIMAN have a BONECRUNCHING HIT!!
INCREDIBLE!!!!!
AMAZING!!!!
Teague31;1071036 said:This weeks Sporting News has Merriman on the cover with the caption "Meet the NFL's New Monster" and also calls him a game plan wrecking stud. The article basically calls him a bigger, faster LT.
Rack;1071139 said:Actually it looked like Merriman backed, like he was afraid or something.
I guess someone turns the "lights out" in his brain for that one or something.
hmcorp;1071102 said:merriman with the bone crushing hit as todd heap lands in the end zone for the winning touchdown but man DIDNT MERRIMAN have a BONECRUNCHING HIT!!
INCREDIBLE!!!!!
AMAZING!!!!
cwalk;1071284 said:For The Madden Players.....even Ea Has This Bias Thing When It Comes To Ware....stats Taken From Madden 2007....tackles...ware 58 Merriman 54...sacks Ware 8 Merriman 10 By Ea Stats I Thought It Was 11...big Hits Ware 0 Merriman 0...ints Ware 0 Merriman 0...pass Defl Ware 0 Merriman 0...catch Allowed Ware 0 Merriman 0...force Fumbles Ware 3 Merriman 2 And Fumble Recovery Ware 0 Merriman 0....ware Over All 86 Merriman Over All 92...thats A 6 Point Difference From There Stats With Only A 2 Sacks Difference...but Ware Has 4 More Tackles And A Force Fumble More Is It Me Or Is Somethin' Wrong With This Picture?
And Im Not Sayin Merriman Doe'snt Deserve This Rating But If He Do...then Ware Should Be Atless A 89 Or 90...im I Wrong?
Jimz31;1071249 said:No, actually Merriman even said he went to "take his head off", and was actually surprised that Heap didn't go down.
It didn't really look to me that he hit him hard enough anyways.
cwalk;1071284 said:For The Madden Players.....even Ea Has This Bias Thing When It Comes To Ware....stats Taken From Madden 2007....tackles...ware 58 Merriman 54...sacks Ware 8 Merriman 10 By Ea Stats I Thought It Was 11...big Hits Ware 0 Merriman 0...ints Ware 0 Merriman 0...pass Defl Ware 0 Merriman 0...catch Allowed Ware 0 Merriman 0...force Fumbles Ware 3 Merriman 2 And Fumble Recovery Ware 0 Merriman 0....ware Over All 86 Merriman Over All 92...thats A 6 Point Difference From There Stats With Only A 2 Sacks Difference...but Ware Has 4 More Tackles And A Force Fumble More Is It Me Or Is Somethin' Wrong With This Picture?
And Im Not Sayin Merriman Doe'snt Deserve This Rating But If He Do...then Ware Should Be Atless A 89 Or 90...im I Wrong?
cnhnyy;1071431 said:I have to agree with Emmitswift. Right now, these two are no even close (1 sack vs 4 sacks). OK, Ware plays "run better", but that is not what we envision him. We have been looking for a pass-rusher since forever and Ware is simply not doing it right now.
I had high hope for Ware after his four games last year but he has been disappointing. He had a breakout game in carolina, but has had only two sacks in the rest FOURTEEN games.
We drafted the wrong player and it is due to Jerry Jones' fetish of small school players.