oh u little troublemaker you LMAOSTSINAZ;1088641 said:I Would Love For This To Happen...any Thoughts?
STSINAZ;1088641 said:I Would Love For This To Happen...any Thoughts?
:laugh2: :laugh2: :laugh2:nyc;1088653 said:Randy Moss? No.
Santana Moss? No. We don't need two Terry Glenn type receivers.
Kate Moss? No. She has cocaine issues.
I say we keep TO.
nyc;1088653 said:Randy Moss? No.
Santana Moss? No. We don't need two Terry Glenn type receivers.
Kate Moss? No. She has cocaine issues.
I say we keep TO.
Then you're taking cocaine with Kate Moss too!theogt;1088657 said:Bledsoe for Brooks. Straight up. I'd take it.
YoMick;1088658 said:Yeah but Kate.... Kate can be used for something
he also runs routes better. but i say we do whatever it takes to get calvin johnson out of the draft next yearsacase;1088660 said:TO blocks better
Two in the hand is better than one in bush :laugh2:nyc;1088663 said:I am a happly married man whom happens to have a wife hotter than Kate Moss. :eyepoke:
neosapien23;1088649 said:Yeah lets trade one turd for another that is always hurt and has already admitted to marijuana use.
bigbadroy;1088737 said:he also runs routes better. but i say we do whatever it takes to get calvin johnson out of the draft next year
You don't want to know my thoughts on this.STSINAZ;1088641 said:I Would Love For This To Happen...any Thoughts?
I hope you meant Garth Brooks and not Aaron.theogt;1088657 said:Bledsoe for Brooks. Straight up. I'd take it.
EMMITSWIFT;1088846 said:How Bout T.o. For Ed Reed ?