Murray not happy with Tony either

[Bleu Star]

What's up, Bleu? Good to see you, brother.

What's up buddy? Hoping for a big win today. Pehaps our less than stellar coaching staff will surprise us today.

 

[beevomav]

Rap Sheet? Seebag avatar?

 

[EPL0c0]

Look for Murray to run the ball 25+ times today.

Against this WSH defense, he should see it 25+times and Randle/Tanner at least 10times combined. if not more.

But if Dallas falls behind on the scoreboard, it'll be Pass-Pass-Pass-Punt.

 

[bark]

We could be playing in a blizzard underwater and Murray wouldn't get 25 rushes.

And if he does ..... He probably won't finish the game

 

[Hoov]

He will. And it will be stupid again because it wil be the same problem. The ones who call plays have no understanding of game situation nor do they have a feel for the game.

And i am talking about the Romo & Garrett combination.
If not the one who makes stupid calls it's the other who audibles to the stupid one.

Agree that They have to share the blame

 

[Bleu Star]

And if he does ..... He probably won't finish the game

Nothing that has transpired in the last several weeks would lead anyone to believe he wouldn't flourish with a lunch pail workload. JG? Is that you?

 

[Bullflop]

I could understand why Romo might be inclined to veto this team's running plays two months ago but certainly not now. The OL has rounded out into a quite competent one that's capable of sustaining a good running game. Gotta say, I don't blame Murray at all if he's miffed at Romo. There's no cause for Romo to neglect the run now.

 

[DejectedFan1996]

Not surprising. I've thought this for some time. You could clearly see the frustration after the first INT when Murray takes off his helmet and yells "RUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNN."

I've mentioned this before and I think I'll continue to do so until things really blow up but T.O. never lies, despite his narcissistic ways.

 

[Alexander]

Aikman said earlier this year that the offense is 100% Callahan's offense. The terminology is the same, but the system is not.

There are tweaks here and there, but I will take Callahan's word over Aikman. He has come out and said it is Garrett's design.

 

[theebs]

Hand it to Murray 25 times today or most days this season and we will be down 38-14 in the fourth qtr and people will call us conservative.

No doubt we run it today a ton because Jerry probably sent the message the public things we should run more.

 

[dguinta1]

winning fixes all. So no surprise with all the frustration.

 

[NeonNinja]

No it is not. He is calling the plays but is not the architect.

This. It's a failed system orchestrated by JG.

 

[junk]

There are tweaks here and there, but I will take Callahan's word over Aikman. He has come out and said it is Garrett's design.

I find it interesting that all offseason it was still Garrett's offense, but now that it gets a little criticism, it is 100% Callahan's.

The play call nonsense in the Packers game is all on the head coach. Despite that, the offense, taken out of Garrett's hands and inconsistent as it is, is still averaging more points per game than anytime that Garrett fully controlled it. The only exception is 2007 when Sparano was still holding his hand. 28.1 this year versus 28.4 that year.

At least they seem to have solved the "We can't score at all in the first half until we throw our game plan out the window" problems from last year.

 

[Ender]

Hand it to Murray 25 times today or most days this season and we will be down 38-14 in the fourth qtr and people will call us conservative.

No doubt we run it today a ton because Jerry probably sent the message the public things we should run more.

Why exactly do you think we would be down by 20+ if we ran the ball more often?

 

[theebs]

Why exactly do you think we would be down by 20+ if we ran the ball more often?

Because its not going to lead to touchdowns and our defense will excel in giving them up.

Jerry just said on the owners box he expects the skins to shut down the running game today.

It's so sad this guy is on the radio so much.

 

[Alexander]

I find it interesting that all offseason it was still Garrett's offense, but now that it gets a little criticism, it is 100% Callahan's.

The play call nonsense in the Packers game is all on the head coach. Despite that, the offense, taken out of Garrett's hands and inconsistent as it is, is still averaging more points per game than anytime that Garrett fully controlled it. The only exception is 2007 when Sparano was still holding his hand. 28.1 this year versus 28.4 that year.

At least they seem to have solved the "We can't score at all in the first half until we throw our game plan out the window" problems from last year.

Goes with the territory.

 

[theebs]

Goes with the territory.

Fwiw

Two players told Ben Rogers in the locker room last week that Callahan is still calling plays.

Makes no sense to argue over it honestly. They are all out in a week.

It's sad that its just like it was under campo again.

Zimmer will take us to Disney land next year on hard knocks I imagine.

And the beat will go on.

 

[Zman5]

Against this WSH defense, he should see it 25+times and Randle/Tanner at least 10times combined. if not more.

But if Dallas falls behind on the scoreboard, it'll be Pass-Pass-Pass-Punt.

More like if Dallas is winning only by 17 points it'll be pass pass pass punt.

 

[SultanOfSix]

it'll be Pass-Pass-Pass-Punt.

A combination this offense is excellent at.

 

[jobberone]

The field is wet, we are running well, and Romo is an ok but not good wet baller. We should run all over them. Of course I expect them to do the same. Their D gives us fits with all the blitzing including run blitzes. If we handle that well then we win. If not then they will have to throw. Morris is the key to stopping them IMO but that depends on us playing at least some pass defense. We will need to blitz some.