My Concerns

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
I continue speaking about the running game and some apparently believe I think we need to run more. That is not the case. So allow me to outline what is and why I am concerned.

The respect the running game brings dictates how the defense plays against the offense. This Cowboy team doesn't get a great deal of respect in the rushing attack. That is exemplified by the fact teams are not afraid to use their front four, or four rushers. This allows the linebackers to play pass, or to play in a nickle defense and smother the passing attack.

This team plays out of the shotgun a great deal, because they pass a great deal. If the defense knows they can handle your running game with their defensive linemen, then they can do what the Giants did today and take away integral parts of the passing game with the double team.

They kept everything in front of them and took Dez out of the equation.

So respect for the running game makes a huge difference.

This new college style offense where the QB reads the play - a *******ized wishbone offense - allows two options. Pass and run. But the defense has to respect the run because it could be one of two players doing so.

This sets up their passing attack off the run and makes it more effective.

Dallas doesn't run play action because the defense does not respect their running game. That is because of the line. Regardless of what this Giants' game appeared to be, they dictated what the offense did by their defense and ability to shut down the run. Even though at the end of the day Murray had 86 yards rushing and a 4.3 per.

Dallas is as close to a one dimensional attack as they can be because of the rushing attack getting no respect.

Can Waters change this? To be determined.

But you just saw the footprint for other teams to play Dallas tonight. Play your lanes against the run with your front line and then sell out for the passing game. Double Dez and force this team to drive the field with Witten and Austin and not make the mental mistakes and get the penalties they are known for.

Now factor in the turnovers that may or may not be there consistently and this game could have been huge the other way. Because Dallas is forced to use a passing attack like a running game and can not get big chunks and keep the defense honest.

When you force Dallas to drive the length of the field predominately with short passing as the focus, when you factor in the mental mistakes this team is known for in penalties, it makes it difficult.

Dallas stops itself.

Now add to it the lack of running game effects the red zone and this team goes away with 3 instead of six.

This was what kept the Cowboys from making the play-offs last year and unless Dunbar and Waters can change this, the team is headed toward another .500 year.

No pass rush and the DB's cannot maintain their position and prevent the passing game from thriving.

So the team that should have been built from the trenches out was not, and the results are pretty evident.

It took six turnovers to stay in this game.

Can they count on that every game? And even if they can, the Bears were at or near the top in turnovers take away last year and did not make the play-offs.

There is a flaw with this team that has not been fixed, as yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken

CowboyStar88

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,164
Reaction score
25,550
That's why I believe Dunbar is a better fit for this offense. His speed and quick cut would've broken some if the runs open. I really believe that DM is not a good back for this offense. JMO.
 

TwoDeep3

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,506
Reaction score
17,339
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
One would hope he can be a difference maker. I find it thin to expect a couple of guys like Waters and Dunbar to be such a huge difference maker for the offense.

That the offense is just two guys away from a powerhouse.

That seems thin to me.
 

Zordon

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,291
Reaction score
46,632
That's why I believe Dunbar is a better fit for this offense. His speed and quick cut would've broken some if the runs open. I really believe that DM is not a good back for this offense. JMO.

I agree with you. I look forward to Dunbar's return. Demarco left many yards on the field today.
 

CowboyStar88

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,164
Reaction score
25,550
One would hope he can be a difference maker. I find it thin to expect a couple of guys like Waters and Dunbar to be such a huge difference maker for the offense.

That the offense is just two guys away from a powerhouse.

That seems thin to me.

I think this offense needs a speed back. I think once Dunbar is back it will help the run game. There were times where DM had lanes but instead of cutting back or being a little more patient he just made contact. There was a run where he started right and then reversed his run backwards. If he had speed and was able to make the cut up field there was room. He doesn't scare a defense at all. Dunbar has that speed and quickness to scare a defense one play and he breaks one it will change how the defense plays. JMO
 

T-RO

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,077
Reaction score
16,851
Although I agree you can't abandon the run...I feel even more strongly that you can't abandon the vertical threat. I'm not sure what is the root of it:
  • Callahan's approach
  • Romo's concern for his health / bad back
  • Concern by the coaches or by Romo himself that he plays too much like a gunslinger

But I see a 2013 Cowboy offense that is coming out of the gate in overly conservative fashion. That's not today's NFL. Look around the league and the top offenses are going... DOWN. THE. FIELD.

(I do wonder if past games with New York's pass rush had the team overly spooked)
 

Tabascocat

Dexternjack
Messages
27,781
Reaction score
38,822
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
I basically said the same thing in my thread, unimpressed with how the game played out. Yes, we won but something didn't feel right about it.

The offense is still a question mark to me and I can't evaluate the defense just yet.

Be prepared for "go suck on a tailpipe" or "go suck it", etc, etc.

If we got the normal 1 or 2 turnovers tonight, the outcome would be different IMO.

I too think Dunbar will be a good addition.
 

tupperware

A Plastic Container
Messages
7,273
Reaction score
93
This seems like a reasonable observation. Whatever the cause, we aren't running the ball very well. Sure, passing wins the game, but if a defense doesn't have to respect your running game AT ALL then they can really take away your passing threats. Very good post and I agree with you. I think that's likely part of the trouble with this offense, but it's not the only issue.

Then as far as the defense is concerned, while the secondary has been underwhelming, the lack of pressure doesn't do them many favors.
 

Fastphilly

Active Member
Messages
342
Reaction score
60
My concern is how the Cowboys benefitted from 5 turnovers and still had a realistic shot of losing the game.
 

dmq

If I'm so pretty, why am I available?
Messages
7,436
Reaction score
941
We had a rookie at Center, a 2nd year UFA at Guard that hadn't played in a month and has never started. Another Guard on roller skates that will be on the bench next week and we played an extremely stout DL. This OL if it stays healthy will be opening up some holes as the season goes forward. I also believe Dunbar could have really exploited the edge if he was playing.
 

Dodger

Indomitable
Messages
4,216
Reaction score
43
You make some pretty solid points. The Giants did exactly what you say here...pretty much ignored the run, doubled Dez, and played pass defense all night. Still, other teams can get away without a running game an win as long as the passing game is good enough, and I think the Cowboys passing game is good enough. I don't think they necessarily showed that tonight, but the pieces are there, and I think as the season goes on, they'll get better. Dez has been doubled before and has produced. Perhaps he just had an off night and Romo and Dez just couldn't hook up. It happens. After one game, I'm not quite ready to concede that this is the magic formula for beating the Cowboys.

Having said that, I'm not in any way suggesting that Dallas couldn't benefit from a better running game. Obviously, they could. How they get there is the big question. Like you, I don't think a couple of guys are going to come in a fix everything, but again, it's early. If this is still happening after a few more weeks, then I'll start to worry.
 

Soth

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,099
Reaction score
952
I expected the running game to be better.... I hope Waters is the answer. He can't be worse than Bernardeau.
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,681
Reaction score
4,533
I disagree with the sentiment that we needed six turnovers to be in this game. Each turnover impacted the way the game turned out, forcing the Giants to be playing from behind all game . The turnover ratio could have been roughly equal and the margin of victory remained the same. Every time the Giants came within one score, our defense stopped them. If we didn't benefit from those turnovers who's to say that trend would not have continued.
 

Gameover

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,792
Reaction score
3,442
I need to see more than one game before I can make definitive statements on what this team is.

If they light up the chiefs next week, then what?
 

SSWilliams31

Active Member
Messages
102
Reaction score
127
A win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win is a win................
 

Gameover

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,792
Reaction score
3,442
Is Dez Bryant who we think he is?

We need him to be that guy in order for this offense to work.

He has to be a difference maker for us. He's the only game breaker we got. Other than Dwayne Harris!
 

CowboyStar88

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,164
Reaction score
25,550
Is Dez Bryant who we think he is?

We need him to be that guy in order for this offense to work.

Not sure what you mean by this. But it appears the offensive game plan was to play it safe as they didn't really appear to want to attack deep or medium at all. I don't think that has anything to do with Bryant. Also I did notice at times the played a guy over the top and underneath and a CB right on him which didn't give him much if a chance. Also I didn't see much in the way of halftime adjustments or any creative ways to get Dez open. I was very disappointed in the gameplan
 

waving monkey

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,540
Reaction score
14,930
a win is a win isn't what the coaches are saying breaking down the film.
good observations 2deep3. I think we'll find the deep ball soon enough
and the running game is a must as you said.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,834
Reaction score
103,557
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Honestly, I'm more concerned with the defense than anything else right now.

People can praise them for the turnovers forced, and rightly so, but without those turnovers, they would have been in some serious trouble.

I didn't see near enough solid defensive series where they actually stopped the Giants' offense.

Seemed to me like if he Giants didn't turn the ball over, they scored.

Feast or famine.

And if your plan is to have to count on 6 turnovers per game, you're in trouble.

I saw this defense have real struggles against 3 wide receiver sets all night long.

Facing a one-dimensional Giants team with only a passing attack, I was hoping for better.
 

Smith22

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,698
Reaction score
1,341
I don't understand why they didn't motion Dez more and play him from the slot more. Make him a harder target to double team.

I'm hoping Waters will open up the ground game some. The ground game HAS to improve for the boys to become a serious threat.
 
Top