starfrombirth;1730190 said:I'm definitely NOT on board with that. There is no way a roster spot should be taken up for 3 years for a project. 2 years and then show what you got otherwise it's time to move on.
TheCount;1730478 said:We didn't even devote one season to Skyler Green.
TheCount;1730733 said:Okay, that's fine. So who is to say there won't be a better WR available than Stanback within the next 4 years? They are basically saying his roster spot is safe, no matter what, there is no competition for his spot because he's a "project"?
I mean this isn't an OL/DL/QB we're talking about here, there are decent WR's in every draft outside of the first two rounds.
TheCount;1730733 said:I mean this isn't an OL/DL/QB we're talking about here, there are decent WR's in every draft outside of the first two rounds.
Wood;1730774 said:I dont know how much sense it makes in choosing 4th rounders as projects. There were some pretty good football players on the board in 4th round that could have helped dallas now. If he were a 7th round project....it would be more tolerable. In any case....Stanback is a looong way off and its pointless to debate his lack of playing time at this point. Maybe we just need to look foward to '08 draft in which I think Dallas takes a WR with their first pick.