MyFox: NFL Column: Overrated Underachievers?...Dallas blurb

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,278
Reaction score
45,632
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Last Edited: Saturday, 11 Oct 2008, 4:34 PM CDT
Created: Saturday, 11 Oct 2008, 4:34 PM CDT
By DAVE GOLDBERG
AP Football Writer


Donovan McNabb apologized this week for the Philadelphia Eagles' 2-3 start, blaming himself more than his teammates.

Maybe he should have blamed all the people who thought the Eagles would be a power this season.

Like a number of teams, they aren't as good as the preseason hype and never were. What looks good on paper never plays out unless a team avoids injuries and/or a brilliant rookie or newcomer emerges.

Though the Eagles have a potentially brilliant rookie, they haven't avoided injuries and they were never as good as the Giants or Cowboys. Their loss at home to the Commanders last week after taking a 14-0 lead suggests they aren't as good as Washington, either.

A capsule look at teams that haven't lived up to expectations:

--Philadelphia (2-3). "I'm embarrassed with the way we played the past two weeks," McNabb wrote in his blog. "I believe that we lost to teams we should have beaten. Not because I think they are not good -- they are. But I still believe we are better; we just didn't show it."

The teams in question are Chicago and Washington. Sorry, Donovan, but look at the scoreboard.

The Eagles' defense was devastating against Pittsburgh, when it registered nine sacks. But it is light up front and depends on blitzing, which means if an opponent can read the blitzes and block them, it moves the ball.

The offense has one true threat: running back Brian Westbrook, who missed the Chicago game with an ankle injury and might be out this week with broken ribs. The injuries are why he's averaging 3.6 yards a carry and 6.9 yards a reception. In 2007, those marks were 4.8 and 8.6.

Receiving? Only rookie DeSean Jackson scares opponents. He also scares the Eagles. Rookies make mistakes. He's made big plays and bad plays, both as a wideout and on special teams.

Short yardage? The Bears and Commanders both stuffed Philadelphia at the goal line. Blame the lack of a big back and a big offensive line that plays with finesse more than power. The Eagles miss injured guard Shawn Andrews badly.

Sure, the Eagles belong in the top half of the league. In the NFC East, that means last place.

--Dallas (4-1). Yes, Dallas. That's because everyone had the Cowboys in the Super Bowl and a retired wide receiver who used to wear No. 19 suggested on television the week before they lost that they were likely to go unbeaten.

The Cowboys are vulnerable in the secondary, a condition not helped by the potential loss of Terence Newman to injury for a while. It's also unclear who's calling the plays: Jerry Jones, Wade Phillips, Jason Garrett or some combination of the above.

Then, there's the combustible cast of characters JJ has assembled.

Who knows what will become of the former Pacman after his alleged fight this week with one of his team-hired bodyguards? At the very least, commissioner Roger Goodell, who reinstated Jones a week before the season, will review it. At the most, he'll be suspended or cut -- as respected columnist Randy Galloway suggested this week.

Then there's T.O. showing signs of turning his third season in Dallas into replays of San Francisco and Philadelphia.

After being involved in a third of the plays in the loss to the Commanders two weeks ago, Terrell Owens complained he hadn't gotten the ball enough. In a win over the Bengals that was closer than it should have been, Owens made a 57-yard TD catch, then went through a strange postgame routine in which he talked about religion, cried and didn't take any questions.

This week, T.O. said he was concerned about the death of a family member, something he didn't mention after the game.

Compare how the Cowboys handle these things to what the Giants do. They dumped Jeremy Shockey before the season, suspended Plaxico Burress last week and won 44-6 without him.

So right now Dallas is No. 3 in its division. You can argue that the Cowboys have more overall talent than the Giants and Commanders (maybe). You can't argue that New York and Washington aren't better teams.

--San Diego (2-3). The Chargers can point all they want to last season, when they also started 2-3 and reached the AFC title game. But this team is not as good.

Playing without the injured Shawne Merriman, one of the NFL's top defensive players, is a big reason San Diego is 28th in overall defense and last in pass defense.

LaDainian Tomlinson, playing on a sore toe, is averaging 3.7 yards a carry. Philip Rivers, only 13-of-28 for 159 yards in Miami last week, has had passer ratings of just 58.8 and 76.3 the last two weeks, ending a string of six straight regular-season games in triple digits.

Norv Turner is a wonderful offensive coordinator but a so-so head coach. That's probably because general manager A.J. Smith wants someone compliant after feuding with Marty Schottenheimer. Smith is great at acquiring players. Not so great at hiring coaches.

--Minnesota and New Orleans (2-3). Anyone who watched these two try to hand each other a game Monday night saw the problems firsthand.

Even after winning, Vikings coach Brad Childress publicly went after punter Chris Kluwe for kicking to Reggie Bush instead of out of bounds. He might be right, but do it in private -- Kluwe is popular with his teammates and all Childress did was alienate them. He's acting like a coach desperate to save his job, not a coach (see Tom Coughlin) who looks in the mirror when his job is in danger and adjusts to the circumstances.

The Saints can blame injuries, too -- although they should have noted when they traded for Shockey that he's never been healthy for a full season. With Deuce McAllister clearly not the old Deuce, they also lack what Philadelphia lacks: a back who can get a yard on third-and-2 feet.

--Indianapolis (2-2). Started at least 7-0 in each of the last three seasons, but no mystery here. The Colts are the perfect demonstration of why an extremely well-run organization can't always field a champion: injuries and age.

--Jacksonville (2-3). Same situation as Indy -- a well-run organization done in by injuries, especially on the offensive line. They also need a better pass rush -- rookies Derrick Harvey and Quentin Groves were drafted to go after quarterbacks, but Groves' 1 1/2 sacks are the total for both.

--Seattle (1-3). It's not clear if the Seahawks are underachievers or just bad. Their only win is over St. Louis, so draw your own conclusions. They signed Julius Jones, who brought Dallas with him to the Northwest -- before the Giants game, he was belittling the NFC East. OK, 61 yards on 17 carries, and ... New York 44, Seattle 6. Not the best way for Mike Holmgren, a good guy and a good coach, to go out.

--Cleveland (1-3). Speaking of the Giants: "It inspires the entire league," Browns linebacker D'Qwell Jackson said. "Everyone talks about it. The way they started and the way they finished gives everybody hope."

Jackson is talking about New York's 0-2 start last season before the turnaround and Super Bowl win. He's suggesting that the Browns, who play the Giants Monday night, might do the same.

Dream. Dream, dream, dream. Dream.

------

DIRTY DOZEN: The top six and bottom six teams in the NFL, based on current level of play:

1. New York Giants (4-0). Fewer expectations than some of the above. A lot of skeptics picked them third in their division, assuming the Super Bowl run was a fluke. It wasn't.

2. Tennessee (5-0). No style points with Kerry Collins running the offense, but 5-0 speaks for itself.

3. Washington (4-1). Six weeks ago, Jim Zorn was considered over his head as a head coach.

4. Dallas (4-1). Given the expectations, No. 4 is underachieving.

5. Pittsburgh (4-1). Ben Roethlisberger might be the MVP of the season's first quarter. Takes a beating behind a shaky offensive line and still makes plays.

6. Carolina (4-1). Julius Peppers decided to show up this season.



27. Seattle (1-3). The defense has allowed 111 points in three losses.

28. Cincinnati (0-5). Vying with Houston for the honor of being the NFL's best winless team.

29. Cleveland (1-3). Yes, the Browns beat the Bengals. But Carson Palmer didn't play in that game.

30. Kansas City (1-4). Larry Johnson went from 198 yards rushing against Denver to 2 on seven carries in Carolina.

31. Detroit (0-4). With Matt Millen gone, will the Lions' next coach finally have a surname that begins with a letter other than "M?" Millen to Mornhinweg, Mariucci and Marinelli.

32. St. Louis (0-4). Look at the schedule and see if you can find a win there.

http://www.myfoxchicago.com/myfox/p...n=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=6.3.1
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
The Eagles have better adjusted stats than we do. In fact we're at the bottom of the pile in the East going solely on stats.

But the record is what counts. What's the point? Don't look for the Eagles to go away easily. They'll probably be in it until the end if they can get a few wins under their belt in the next few weeks. With the Niners, bye week, Atlanta, and Seahawks they have a chance to get back in it with the Giants coming up after the Hawks. That's a home game with the Giants. They should be favored in all those contests coming into the Giants game. Wouldn't hurt my feelings for them to tank but I'm not counting on it.
 

Boysboy

New Member
Messages
4,852
Reaction score
0
jobberone;2325984 said:
The Eagles have better adjusted stats than we do. In fact we're at the bottom of the pile in the East going solely on stats.

But the record is what counts. What's the point? Don't look for the Eagles to go away easily. They'll probably be in it until the end if they can get a few wins under their belt in the next few weeks. With the Niners, bye week, Atlanta, and Seahawks they have a chance to get back in it with the Giants coming up after the Hawks. That's a home game with the Giants. They should be favored in all those contests coming into the Giants game. Wouldn't hurt my feelings for them to tank but I'm not counting on it.

I agree-however, it's funny how we're 4-1 and the sky is falling, but the Eagles are 2-3, 2 of the losses being in the NFCE, and everything's OK for them?

Like I said-I agree with you, but it's all ironic, that's all.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
you can definitely argue that we are more talented than the Giants and Commanders

but they have systems, we don't, so yes, until we find an identity on both sides of the ball, and beat both, they are better teams
 

Boysboy

New Member
Messages
4,852
Reaction score
0
WoodysGirl;2325968 said:
Then there's T.O. showing signs of turning his third season in Dallas into replays of San Francisco and Philadelphia.

After being involved in a third of the plays in the loss to the Commanders two weeks ago, Terrell Owens complained he hadn't gotten the ball enough. In a win over the Bengals that was closer than it should have been, Owens made a 57-yard TD catch, then went through a strange postgame routine in which he talked about religion, cried and didn't take any questions.

This week, T.O. said he was concerned about the death of a family member, something he didn't mention after the game.

*sigh* No matter what TO does, good or bad, noone will be satisfied.
 

theogt

Surrealist
Messages
45,846
Reaction score
5,912
How is there any lack of clarity regarding who is calling the plays?
 

Boysboy

New Member
Messages
4,852
Reaction score
0
theogt;2326009 said:
How is there any lack of clarity regarding who is calling the plays?

Take it with a grain of salt-really, not making excuses for the Skins game(as we were waxed), but, let's say, if Sam Hurt had somehow got a clean recovery on that onsides kick, then we would be 5-0, everything would be all good, and this writer's analysis on us would be COMPLETELY different. Nothing about who's really running the show, nothing about what TO said, nothing about Pacman's run-ins this week, nada. Aside from that, the Skins DID wax us and the score wasn't nearly as close as it looked.

Pt being that unless you're meeting everyone's expectations, they'll overly and cherry-pick all these faults you supposedly have.
 

Woods

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,460
Reaction score
61
We need a "signature" game, IMO.

A game where we play solid in all facets of the game, with no turnovers and minimal penalties. Where we are aggressive offensively on call plays and where we play aggressively on defense.

I think a game like that would help to take this team to the next level.

We're definitely capable of doing it. We need to focus and execute.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
Boysboy;2325987 said:
I agree-however, it's funny how we're 4-1 and the sky is falling, but the Eagles are 2-3, 2 of the losses being in the NFCE, and everything's OK for them?

Like I said-I agree with you, but it's all ironic, that's all.

Irony is an ok word. Upset is all it gets me. I don't know if being forged in the fires of the NFC East means we're tougher for a SB or just more beat up with more losses.

Looks like we could see one of them fall to the wayside early.
 

firehawk350

Active Member
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
0
I'm pretty sure it makes you tougher. Train hard now, bleed less later (its a spec ops saying, but it applies)
 

firehawk350

Active Member
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
0
Bob Sacamano;2326060 said:
wait

what?
I was responding to jobberone's post about whether being in the NFC East just beat you up or made you tougher. I responded with an old spec ops saying.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
firehawk350;2326052 said:
I'm pretty sure it makes you tougher. Train hard now, bleed less later (its a spec ops saying, but it applies)

Were you in special forces?
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
firehawk350;2326070 said:
I was responding to jobberone's post about whether being in the NFC East just beat you up or made you tougher. I responded with an old spec ops saying.

you could have just used the tried and true, "what doesn't kill you, only makes you stronger"

but thanks for that nugget nonetheless, cheers
 

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,681
Reaction score
4,533
Bob Sacamano;2325988 said:
you can definitely argue that we are more talented than the Giants and Commanders

but they have systems, we don't, so yes, until we find an identity on both sides of the ball, and beat both, they are better teams
A ridiculous assertion
 
Top