DallasFanSince86
Pessimism Sucks
- Messages
- 2,064
- Reaction score
- 19
DallasEast;2909115 said:http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/Punting%20in%20New%20Stadium/PANICPUNTGIF.gif
:laugh2:
That's pretty good DallasEast.
DallasEast;2909115 said:http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/Punting%20in%20New%20Stadium/PANICPUNTGIF.gif
DallasEast;2909115 said:http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/Punting%20in%20New%20Stadium/PANICPUNTGIF.gif
Originally Published: November 15, 2007Hostile;2908127 said:In other words, he hit the video board on purpose. No one will ever tell me differently and convince me.
I want you to think about this. What kind of moron punts down the middle of the field? According to Matt McBriar a good Punter always tries to pin the ball inside the 20 yard line. The sidelines are a Punter's friends.
It is extremely rare and questionable to punt to the middle of the field where an elusive return man has a wide open field to either side to try and elude tacklers. It is also rare to try and punt the ball straight up in the air. So straight up in the air and down the middle of the field?
That equals either stupidity or intent to hit the board.
DallasEast;2909115 said:http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/Punting%20in%20New%20Stadium/PANICPUNTGIF.gif
DallasEast;2909115 said:http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/Punting%20in%20New%20Stadium/PANICPUNTGIF.gif
What do your eyes tell you about what "they" are saying? You see no punts towards anywhere but the middle of the field?jimmy40;2909066 said:That's strange all I've heard on different sports shows since this happened is how punters don't go for the corners anymore.
LeonDixson;2908964 said:I don't want this to sound angry or anything so please don't take it that way. But my answer is because it shouldn't be an issue in the 1st place. A punt hit the video board. So what? Yeah, it could have been placed higher to begin with, but so what? Is that really a big deal?
When the Cowboys go to play a team that share a field with a baseball team like Oakland, etc. and someone slips on the dirt, where is the outrage? It could have been avoided if the home team had some foresight and bought an artificial turf playing field to roll out before the football game.
When the Squealers allow a college team to play on Saturday before they play on Sunday in bad weather, do the pundits give a crap? The sloppy field where punts have been known to stick in the mud and get no roll at all impact the game to a much larger degree than an occasional do over. That situation is totally avoidable.
That's why I consider it a "win". It's a little deal that was blown entirely out of proportion to it's real consequence and impact on the game just because Fisher takes this opportunity to turn into a cry baby.
Waaa the nasty Cowboys game planned against us.
Waaa our punt hit the scoreboard and I had to throw a challenge flag even though it wasn't charged as a challenge
Waaa our players had to walk close by their fans when entering the field.
DallasEast;2909115 said:http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/Punting%20in%20New%20Stadium/PANICPUNTGIF.gif
I love it. The KingKongTron swatting down punts and everybody losing their damn minds over it.DallasEast;2909115 said:http://i356.***BLOCKED***/albums/oo4/DallasEast1701/Punting%20in%20New%20Stadium/PANICPUNTGIF.gif
:hammock:bbgun;2909757 said:NFL adopts do-overs; games to end when Jimmy's mom calls for him
By MJD
Yahoo Sports
I absolutely do not get it.
bbgun said:a giant clown's mouth that spits balls back after they go through the field goal posts.
bbgun;2909757 said:NFL adopts do-overs; games to end when Jimmy's mom calls for him
By MJD
Yahoo Sports
Well, it happened. The NFL officially has officially embraced do-overs as league policy. In the new Cowboys Stadium, when a ball hits the monstrous video board, we will have a do-over, just like you had when you were a kid playing in your backyard and a wayward ball went into the street, hit a telephone wire, or got caught in a tree. The NFL has adopted a rule widely used by nine-year-olds across the world. Awesome.
In other rule changes announced today, the NFL announced that all games end immediately the second Jimmy's mom yells, "Supper's ready!", it's every man for themselves if someone accidentally breaks a window, and no one -- and I mean no one -- better tell their mom if Tony says another bad word. In addition, when games have concluded, any low-down mongrel who drinks the purple stuff instead of the Sunny D will be suspended for eight games.
This is absolutely absurd. The video board can be raised. Maybe it costs a lot to do it, but for Pete's sake, is the NFL hurting for money? Is Jerry Jones hurting for money? There's absolutely no reason why it can't be raised, and yet, we're going to head into the NFL season with a possible impediment to fair, competitive play. It doesn't make one damn bit of sense.
The gunners on the punt team can get exhausted when having to do their extremely taxing job of consecutive plays. A game-changing punt return could be wiped out if replay shows (and those extra replay breaks are going to be oodles and oodles of fun) that the ball nicked the board. A punt that pins someone deep in their own territory could be nullified for the same reason. A season-ending injury could be suffered on a play that will not count.
All would cause major controversy. All would be unfair. And all could be avoided, quite simply.
I absolutely do not get it. If we're going to leave one obstruction in play, we might as well do it all over the league. Turn NFL fields into mini-golf courses. Windmills to run through, moats in the red zone, a giant clown's mouth that spits balls back after they go through the field goal posts.
The only possible reason for this is that Jerry Jones has a tremendous amount of stroke with the NFL and Roger Goodell. If Jerry can get away with a hazard to competitive play in his stadium, it's a little frightening to think about what he or other owners could talk Goodell into.
bbgun;2909757 said:NFL adopts do-overs; games to end when Jimmy's mom calls for him
By MJD
Yahoo Sports
Well, it happened. The NFL officially has officially embraced do-overs as league policy. In the new Cowboys Stadium, when a ball hits the monstrous video board, we will have a do-over, just like you had when you were a kid playing in your backyard and a wayward ball went into the street, hit a telephone wire, or got caught in a tree. The NFL has adopted a rule widely used by nine-year-olds across the world. Awesome.
In other rule changes announced today, the NFL announced that all games end immediately the second Jimmy's mom yells, "Supper's ready!", it's every man for themselves if someone accidentally breaks a window, and no one -- and I mean no one -- better tell their mom if Tony says another bad word. In addition, when games have concluded, any low-down mongrel who drinks the purple stuff instead of the Sunny D will be suspended for eight games.
This is absolutely absurd. The video board can be raised. Maybe it costs a lot to do it, but for Pete's sake, is the NFL hurting for money? Is Jerry Jones hurting for money? There's absolutely no reason why it can't be raised, and yet, we're going to head into the NFL season with a possible impediment to fair, competitive play. It doesn't make one damn bit of sense.
The gunners on the punt team can get exhausted when having to do their extremely taxing job of consecutive plays. A game-changing punt return could be wiped out if replay shows (and those extra replay breaks are going to be oodles and oodles of fun) that the ball nicked the board. A punt that pins someone deep in their own territory could be nullified for the same reason. A season-ending injury could be suffered on a play that will not count.
All would cause major controversy. All would be unfair. And all could be avoided, quite simply.
I absolutely do not get it. If we're going to leave one obstruction in play, we might as well do it all over the league. Turn NFL fields into mini-golf courses. Windmills to run through, moats in the red zone, a giant clown's mouth that spits balls back after they go through the field goal posts.
The only possible reason for this is that Jerry Jones has a tremendous amount of stroke with the NFL and Roger Goodell. If Jerry can get away with a hazard to competitive play in his stadium, it's a little frightening to think about what he or other owners could talk Goodell into.
I agree with this 100%.Undisputed;2909254 said:Personally, I never called it a "big deal". Just because it isn't the end of the world as we know it, doesn't mean that Jerry and the NFL don't deserve criticism. If the video board can be raised without a ridiculous amount of inconvenience then it should definately be moved up, even if the guy in row A seat 5 has to deal with a bit more of a glare. I don't see how punts hitting our video board and causing an unnecessary distraction is a "win" for us.
........Rogah;2909956 said:I agree with this 100%.
I love the Cowboys but I refuse to be a homer or an apologist. If/when this happens in the regular season, it will be embarrassing for both the team and the league. And since it took about 40 minutes of the first preseason game for it to happen (and I don't for a second believe the punter was trying to hit it), I think we can expect it will happen again eventually.
DallasEast;2909960 said:........