NFL Blog: Schefter & Glazer agree Owens not in Dallas in 09

dcfanatic

Benched
Messages
10,408
Reaction score
1
http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/01/29/is-terrell-owens-done-in-big-d/
------------------------------
Is Owens done in Big D?

Posted: Fantasy | Michael Fabiano | Tags: Dallas Cowboys, Terrell Owens

In an interview seen Thursday on NFL Network’s Total Access, Adam Schefter and FOX Sports’ Jay Glazer both agreed that Terrell Owens would not be in Dallas in 2009. If you’re a fantasy football enthusiast, hearing the top two information men in the business making such a statement is very interesting.

Owens, 35, failed to meet statistical expectations last season, though he still finished with close to 70 receptions, 1,052 yards and 10 touchdowns. The reason T.O. would be released are less about his skills and abilities and more about his, well, outspoken personality and the Cowboys desire to change their locker room atmosphere.

If Schefter and Glazer are right and Owens will soon be out of the mix in Dallas, the past indicates the value of Tony Romo would suffer.

In 21 games while Owens was in Philadelphia, Donovan McNabb averaged 280 passing yards and two touchdown passes (4,480 passing yards, 32 touchdowns — 16 games). In the 40 games post T.O., McNabb has averaged 247 passing yards and 1.5 touchdown passes (3,952 yards, 24 touchdowns — 16 games).

While a member of the San Francisco 49ers, Owens was integral in the development of Jeff Garcia into a fantasy football star. But once T.O. left for the Eagles in 2004, Garcia’s stock plummeted. What’s more, Garcia has never even come close to posting the same sort of numbers in his last five seasons as he had with Owens.

Of course, Romo would have the advantage of a more talented core of players around him than McNabb or Garcia had once Owens left. But it seems a bit outlandish to think that his numbers wouldn’t decrease a bit without such a lethal weapon.

One player whose value would soar is Roy E. Williams. He would go from second fiddle to Owens to the top wideout in the team’s pass attack. In fact, he’d go from a No. 3 fantasy wideout in drafts to someone who could be considered more of a No. 1 at the position.

A Cowboys team without Owens would also mean more targets for Jason Witten, Patrick Crayton and Miles Austin.

While no one knows for sure what will happen in Big D, it looks like it will be a very interesting offseason for not only the NFL, but fantasy football owners
as well.
---------------------------------------

This audio clip was Schefter and Florio on Total Access yesterday talking about T.O. and his realisty show..

Schefter and Florio talk T.O.
-------------------------------------------------------------

'There is smoke to that Cowboy fire...' - Schefter.

fire_meaney.gif
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Well, if Jay Glazer is reporting something like this, Wow! He's usually right about his information...

However, unfortunetly, I think TO is here for the coming season. I just can't seem to see how they can cut him.
 

sacase

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,347
Reaction score
2,612
TO is here for at least another year. They don't know what they have in RW11 yet and frankly last year was rather uninspiring. I would not hang the franchise on him yet.
 

Jimz31

The Sarcastic One
Messages
14,388
Reaction score
231
And who are THEIR sources?

And, does JJ agree or disagree with them? I'll bet he doesn't.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
5Stars;2609381 said:
Well, if Jay Glazer is reporting something like this, Wow! He's usually right about his information...

However, unfortunetly, I think TO is here for the coming season. I just can't seem to see how they can cut him.
he is. isn't it funny how the guy who never played football atleast that I know of is right more than any other commentator?
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,664
Reaction score
86,205
Jimz31;2609403 said:
And who are THEIR sources?

And, does JJ agree or disagree with them? I'll bet he doesn't.

If Glazer reports it than hes most likely got a solid lead.
 

SLATEmosphere

Benched
Messages
9,633
Reaction score
2
That Mcnabb stat is skued..Mcnabb didnt have Roy Williams,Jason Witten and three solid RB's in Philly.
 

ddh33

Active Member
Messages
4,934
Reaction score
2
Please, please, please...

And fantasy football doesn't mean a thing to me. I care more about winning on the field...

I think the Cowboys would likely be better equipped to win on the field, even if they did lose a productive player on offense. I do believe in addition by subtraction.

But more than that, I believe in character. A team filled with front-runners will never be able to win a championship. At some point, there will be adversity for every team in this league. We've seen what happens when this team faces adversity. Some guys bear down and try to fight through it. Some guys wax philosophical about it, which is fine by me. Some guys rip the QB, coaches, and anyone else they can. Some guys blame the media...

I don't think talent is a problem here, with or without TO. I think heart and character is the problem, and I think that improves a great deal when you find a new leader for this team. And you can't find that leader while TO is policing this locker room.
 

dcfanatic

Benched
Messages
10,408
Reaction score
1
Jimz31;2609403 said:
And who are THEIR sources?

And, does JJ agree or disagree with them? I'll bet he doesn't.

If you can't trust Glazer and Schefter than you don't trust anyone in the media.

Correct?
 

Established1971

fiveandcounting
Messages
5,800
Reaction score
4,322
Rampage;2609406 said:
he is. isn't it funny how the guy who never played football atleast that I know of is right more than any other commentator?

I dont find that funny, the ones who havent played are more intellligent and observant.
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
fiveandcounting;2609479 said:
I dont find that funny, the ones who havent played are more intellligent and observant.
it has nothing to with that. he has better sources and doesn't jump the gun till he knows what his sources say are true.
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
sacase;2609400 said:
TO is here for at least another year. They don't know what they have in RW11 yet and frankly last year was rather uninspiring. I would not hang the franchise on him yet.

tyke1doe;2609492 said:
Add another one in agreement with this statement.


He will finish out contract with Cowboys. JMO.
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
Terrell Owens is going to be playing for the Dallas Cowboys in 2009.

Jerry Jones has $9.6 Million reasons to keep him.

However, I do agree with the author when he makes the case that the Cowboys are more than talented enough to fill the void once Terrell Owens leaves.

Not sure why folks think the Dallas Cowboys are nothing without Terrell Owens.
 

Venger

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,661
Reaction score
788
I think there is little good reason to ditch TO, and even if I did, I still think they are married to the guy for one more year. I am less sold on the talent pool around him - I love Witten but his game is those seam routes and dumping in behind linebacker zone coverage, that's helped by TO taking corner/safety but there regardless, Witten works pretty well with or without TO. RW really disappointed last season, but even when on, he's a big possession kind of receiver, a good compliment to a receiver like TO who commands attention. We really should have gotten more out of him, but I am willing to give them one more chance to figure out how to use their receiving talent to the best of their ability.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,846
Reaction score
16,869
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Maikeru-sama;2609529 said:
Terrell Owens is going to be playing for the Dallas Cowboys in 2009.

Jerry Jones has $9.6 Million reasons to keep him.

However, I do agree with the author when he makes the case that the Cowboys are more than talented enough to fill the void once Terrell Owens leaves.

Not sure why folks think the Dallas Cowboys are nothing without Terrell Owens.


That confuses me too?

It's like...."this team sucks without the player!"

The Cowboys are doomed without one player?


Wow!
 

Maikeru-sama

Mick Green 58
Messages
14,548
Reaction score
6
5Stars;2609558 said:
That confuses me too?

It's like...."this team sucks without the player!"

The Cowboys are doomed without one player?


Wow!

Yep, especially since we haven't won anything of any real value since he has been on the team.

I believe there are maybe 1-3 Players we can't afford to lose and Terrell Owens isn't one of them.
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
I really lmao when I read "one more year"

He was only going to last one year with us.

He is going into year FOUR.


He wasnt going to sign ANOTHER deal with us.

He DID.






If you keep saying he is gone EVERY year in 6 years you may eventually be right.
:lmao2: You Agendanators you!
 
Top