NFL--considering 18 game season/ each player limited to 16

sbark

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,213
Reaction score
4,407
The NFL is reportedly pushing for an 18-game regular season in which each player would only be allowed to play in 16 games.
According to ProFootballTalk a league source said "the NFL quietly has resumed its push to persuade the NFLPA to expand the regular-season to 18 games" even though "players consistently have declined to agree to an expanded regular season."
The outlet notes that "while the NFL still has the ability to unilaterally slash the preseason in half, which at one point was viewed as the leverage necessary to persuade the NFLPA to agree to add those two games to the regular season, the league is unlikely to do that" because "stadium lease agreements typically require at least 10 games per year." Currently, NFL teams play eight home games in the regular season and two home games in the preseason.
As ProFootballTalk noted, "though a union source has described the possibility of an 18-game season with a 16-game limit per player as 'fascinating,' many fans would disagree" "loudly," especially fantasy football players.
The NFL is also seeking to expand the regular season as the league puts more of an emphasis on player safety.
 
Messages
2,928
Reaction score
3,858
Allowing players to only play in 16 games is a dumb idea.

The players are the ones adverse to playing more than 16 regular season games but I agree, still a dumb idea. Can't imagine not playing your best players, especially a franchise QB, for 2 regular season games each year.
 

sbark

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,213
Reaction score
4,407
I wonder if games missed to injury or recovery will count........and then if roster size will be upped
 

sbark

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,213
Reaction score
4,407
The players are the ones adverse to playing more than 16 regular season games but I agree, still a dumb idea. Can't imagine not playing your best players, especially a franchise QB, for 2 regular season games each year.

......would present an another entire strategy for coaches to have to manage thru, that's for sure...........it would be a big chessgame, cat and mouse
 
Messages
2,928
Reaction score
3,858
......would present an another entire strategy for coaches to have to manage thru, that's for sure...........it would be a big chessgame, cat and mouse

yes, almost fantasy football like....my initial reaction, don't like it
 

jrumann59

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,017
Reaction score
8,770
I wonder if games missed to injury or recovery will count........and then if roster size will be upped

It would have to. No way you can field a full team for 18 games where you have about 35 of your players playing. You would need to double up on kickers/punters. I would say they would need to allow you to have 85 man roster with 55 man gameday roster
 

sacase

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,345
Reaction score
2,611
Dumb in so many ways, you would have to basically throw 2 games. Let's be real, the talent level drops significantly from the starters to the bench and even more from the bench to the practice squad. HOWEVER; it would be changes to the salary cap and likely less big contracts for the vets as you now have additional bodies on the teams.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
The NFL is basically asking teams to throw away 2 games a year if that is the case.

How many teams have a backup QB they can rely on to win games?

If its me, I'm playing all my scrubs week 1 and 2, and getting over training camp injuries. There is enough time to recover in an 18 game season.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
Dumb in so many ways, you would have to basically throw 2 games. Let's be real, the talent level drops significantly from the starters to the bench and even more from the bench to the practice squad. HOWEVER; it would be changes to the salary cap and likely less big contracts for the vets as you now have additional bodies on the teams.

The NFL is basically asking teams to throw away 2 games a year if that is the case.

How many teams have a backup QB they can rely on to win games?

If its me, I'm playing all my scrubs week 1 and 2, and getting over training camp injuries. There is enough time to recover in an 18 game season.

I am not for this propsal, but I don't necessarily think a team would be automatically throwing away two games a season. You just have to time it right. If you are playing the Jags you can win with a backup QB. And while the talent level does drop off between starters and backups, you don't have to sub out all of your starters for the same game. And since every team will be in the same boat, it still comes down to who has the better players on the field. I think it is just too convoluted of a system to be practical and I also don't think it really helps alleviate injuries. The only real benefit is when you have an injured starter who needs a game or two off to recover.
 

Eric_Boyer

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,789
Reaction score
1,573
the increased value in your second and third QB is an interesting ramification of such a rule change.
 

viman96

Thread Killer
Messages
21,555
Reaction score
22,657
Major FAIL IMO. Rosters would need to be increased. Teams would basically need a second set of starters for 2 games a year.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
This is a terrible idea IMO. I know this, if I'm a season ticket holder and I pay for 18 games, I am expecting to see the players I paid for to play.

So much stupid here. Hard to believe the NFL can not see it.
 
Top