NFL Reports of positive drug tests are self serving rumors

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,433
Reaction score
753
NFL: Reports of positive drug tests are 'self-serving' rumors
The NFL issued a stern statement dismissing reports of positive drug tests at the league's combine in February after several prospective draft picks were alleged to have tested positive in multiple stories last week.

The website NFLDraftBible.com reported on Thursday that USC LBs Brian Cushing and Clay Matthews had tested positive for steroids and that Boston College DT B.J. Raji, Illinois CB Vontae Davis and Florida WR Percy Harvin had tested positive for marijuana. SI.com also reported on Thursday that Raji had a positive drug test at the combine.

On Friday, the league cautioned that such reports should be scrutinized because the drug tests administered at the combine are confidential and that not even team officials are informed of the results:

"Neither the 32 clubs nor the league office know the results of drug or steroid tests taken at the 2009 combine. The independent medical advisors who administer the tests have notified in writing those players and only those players who tested positive at the combine.

"Unfortunately, rumors about draft eligible players, including rumors about test results, begin to circulate every year at this time. Many of these rumors are circulated for self-serving reasons and they are terribly unfair to the players and their families."

A string of denials and admonishments followed the NFLDraftBible.com stories, particularly in defense of the USC linebackers.

USC coach Pete Carroll called the report "absolutely false." He told the L.A. Times, "This is an [sic] major example of irresponsible reporting, and the site that published this report should be ashamed of themselves."

Cushing's agent, Tom Condon refuted the story and called it a "vicious and false rumor." Matthews' agent, Mark Humenik, called for NFLDraftBible.com to retract the report, which he called a "grossly irresponsible and unfair accusation." As of late Sunday, there had been no change in the reporting by NFLDraftBible.com

Davis' agent issed a similar denial. "Neither Vontae nor our office has received any notification of any positive test whether for marijuana or any other banned substance," the agent, Todd France, told the Rockford Register Star.

This period in the run-up to the NFL draft is known as the "lying season" as teams, players and agents jockey for positioning in the annual selection process. So news of players' stock rising and falling and teams supposedly leaning one way or another should be considered carefully.
Hat tip: PFT
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,654
Reaction score
42,998
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Well if those reports truly are false...sue the site or reporter from the site.

I doubt they do, because the reports are probably true.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
BrAinPaiNt;2718212 said:
Well if those reports truly are false...sue the site or reporter from the site.

I doubt they do, because the reports are probably true.

True, however the teams would know the truth because the players are tested during the combines.
 

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,230
Reaction score
20,501
Doomsday101;2718218 said:
True, however the teams would know the truth because the players are tested during the combines.

On Friday, the league cautioned that such reports should be scrutinized because the drug tests administered at the combine are confidential and that not even team officials are informed of the results:

"Neither the 32 clubs nor the league office know the results of drug or steroid tests taken at the 2009 combine.

This article says the NFL says the tests are confidential, so NO ONE has the information this website is claiming to have. In reality, this is probably fiction. Just ask A-Rod.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,312
Reaction score
32,716
BrAinPaiNt;2718212 said:
Well if those reports truly are false...sue the site or reporter from the site.

I doubt they do, because the reports are probably true.

A law suit won't come until after the draft. A player would have to establish not only that the reports were not true, but that he suffered damage from the report.

Of course, that may be difficult to prove because ...

a.) how do you determine if one of the players was going to be drafted higher, unless he drops all the way to the fifth round.

b.) I suspect the NFL would probably fight any efforts to make them turn over confidential information, citing (I assume) doctor-client privilege.

But I agree with your overall sentiment. If the reports are true, someone should sue the publisher. That would make someone think twice about spreading such rumors, especially if a lawsuit were successful.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
it's obvious to anyone Brian Cushing is juicing

Aaron Maybin may be too, he put on a significant amount of weight before the Combine, all muscle, hmmm
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,868
Reaction score
11,567
Why even test the players then?

If the league doesn't tell anyone, why even test?

This is complete BS.

How can the league hold teams accountable for drafting bad eggs if they keep information away from the teams.

I don't even know why the league cares. Then again, if too many top prospects are testing positive and their draft stocks fail, ratings for the draft will probably fall a little bit. Can't have that.
 

JerryFan

Active Member
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
7
I can tell you the Vontae Davis rumor is false, and Ron Zook is pissed about it. There was an article about it here in Illinois.
 

jobberone

Kane Ala
Messages
54,219
Reaction score
19,659
There are Federal laws concerning the privacy of these kinds of things. Also the NFL is not in a position to refute anything when they are under Federal law not to discuss it with anyone.

Doesn't mean someone in the testing structure isn't leaking information but they had better hope they don't get caught.
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
Hoofbite;2718322 said:
Why even test the players then?

If the league doesn't tell anyone, why even test?

This is complete BS.


I think (but I'm not sure) that the players are tested in order to see if they will get strike one of the NFL's anti-drug policy. IOW, the NFL doesn't tell the 32 teams about the positive results... but the player gets his "strike one" in the NFL drug program. He will go into his NFL career knowing he has one less chance with that sort of thing... and hopefully he will stop.

They don't tell the 32 teams because they don't want to be responsible for lowering the earning potential of any player. Again, I'm not sure about this, but I think it's how it happens.
 

sonnyboy

Benched
Messages
7,357
Reaction score
0
I don't know what surprises me more, the fact that teams aren't notified of positive tests, or the fact that I didn't know this.

This is rediculous. What kind of deterent is this policy? Ok all I need to do is start juicing 4,6,8 weeks before the draft, when my College season is over.

Add 5 to 10 lbs of muscle, strength and just a little more quickness. Take myself from a boderline 7th rd pick to a first day selection.

That must be an irrisistable temptation to many of these kids. Do steriods in a big way for only a few months and perhaps earn yourself hundreds of thousands of extra dollars. Perhaps a few million.
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,868
Reaction score
11,567
sonnyboy;2718475 said:
I don't know what surprises me more, the fact that teams aren't notified of positive tests, or the fact that I didn't know this.

This is rediculous. What kind of deterent is this policy? Ok all I need to do is start juicing 4,6,8 weeks before the draft, when my College season is over.

Add 5 to 10 lbs of muscle, strength and just a little more quickness. Take myself from a boderline 7th rd pick to a first day selection.

That must be an irrisistable temptation to many of these kids. Do steriods in a big way for only a few months and perhaps earn yourself hundreds of thousands of extra dollars. Perhaps a few million.

Yeah that policy is a joke. How are teams supposed to clean up the perception of the league if the league covers up failed tests? They need to tell teams so players not only watch their stock fall but their contracts as well.

If I drafted a guy who later tested positive and then came to find out that the league had failed to mention a previous failed test and had also decided to suspend the guy for a 2nd failed test, I'd be one livid mofo.
 
Top