NFL To Add Friday Night to Draft Weekend?

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
NFL moving draft into prime time?

TV.gif


According to an industry source, the NFL has had preliminary discussions about moving the first round of the draft into prime time on Friday, reports the STAR-TRIBUNE.

The remaining rounds would be conducted on Saturday and Sunday. The thinking on this issue appears to be twofold. One, carrying the opening round in prime time means more viewers would be available to watch. Two, some NFL officials believe it would be a good idea to give teams time to decompress before Round 2.

The biggest issue with having Round 1 of the draft at night would be making sure it could be done in a reasonable amount of time. Saturday's first round took 6 hours, 8 minutes, easily topping the previous high of 5:48 set in 2002.

But getting it shortened might be a challenge because there doesn't seem to be much of an appetite from NFL officials to cut down on the current 15 minutes between picks.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,947
Reaction score
23,096
I like this idea, my head is spinning by the end of Saturday. I say start at 4:00 central Friday night and be done by 10:00. I think they may need to ask teams that have no intention of trading to quit hogging the whole fifteen minutes.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
"Decompress"?

I don't like the idea myself. I like the fact the pressure is on all of the time.

It leads to more bad picks and excitement.

You can see the effect at the start of day two quite a bit. You can tell teams make smarter and more decisive choices right off the bat.

If they do this, then I think they should have a lottery system with the top choices like the NBA does. That adds spice. Another idea is to shorten the length of the clock time. Put the pressure back on.
 

adamknite

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,226
Reaction score
805
Alexander;1487891 said:
"Decompress"?

I don't like the idea myself. I like the fact the pressure is on all of the time.

It leads to more bad picks and excitement.

You can see the effect at the start of day two quite a bit. You can tell teams make smarter and more decisive choices right off the bat.

If they do this, then I think they should have a lottery system with the top choices like the NBA does. That adds spice. Another idea is to shorten the length of the clock time. Put the pressure back on.

I hate the lottery idea, but completely agree on shortening the clock. They've had months to think of all the possible scenerios and to guage other teams interest in a certain player(s). What is 15 minutes going to do?
 

BrAinPaiNt

Mike Smith aka Backwoods Sexy
Staff member
Messages
78,644
Reaction score
42,989
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Alexander;1487891 said:
"Decompress"?

I don't like the idea myself. I like the fact the pressure is on all of the time.

It leads to more bad picks and excitement.

You can see the effect at the start of day two quite a bit. You can tell teams make smarter and more decisive choices right off the bat.

If they do this, then I think they should have a lottery system with the top choices like the NBA does. That adds spice. Another idea is to shorten the length of the clock time. Put the pressure back on.

Agreed...just not a fan of this idea.

I think it is more than just the time with the NFL...I think they are seeing another way to milk another day and some dollars out of the draft.

But still...I don't care for the idea because I don't think many people are going to want to stay up to 2-3 in the morning to see the first round.

Stick to what is working now OR...Make the first day (Saturday) just for the first 2 rounds and move rounds 3-7 on Sunday. Although I am sure people would rather it not be so long on sundays.

Just stick with what is working IMO. No need to change it up because of a record length first round this year or because the NFL wants to milk an extra day for money.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
adamknite;1487897 said:
I hate the lottery idea

The main reason I would go for the lottery is that it eliminates the laying down you see late in the year by teams trying to get that choice. Take the top 3-5 and see what happens. Most of the time the team that has the worse record wins it anyways, but it is fun to have the gambling aspect in there.

And if you are into the first round being an event, make it one. Go all out.
 

Juke99

...Abbey someone
Messages
22,279
Reaction score
126
Alexander;1487900 said:
The main reason I would go for the lottery is that it eliminates the laying down you see late in the year by teams trying to get that choice. Take the top 3-5 and see what happens. Most of the time the team that has the worse record wins it anyways, but it is fun to have the gambling aspect in there.

And if you are into the first round being an event, make it one. Go all out.


The lottery idea never works in terms of stopping teams from laying down...if they take the five worst records and institute a lottery for those teams, what's to stop a team that is 6th going into the final week from laying down in order to be in the lottery?
 

Zaxor

Virtus Mille Scuta
Messages
8,406
Reaction score
38
I vote No... leave the draft as it is.

now do you think anybody at NFL HQ gives a shiite what I think...:)

follow the $
 

adamknite

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,226
Reaction score
805
Alexander;1487900 said:
The main reason I would go for the lottery is that it eliminates the laying down you see late in the year by teams trying to get that choice. Take the top 3-5 and see what happens. Most of the time the team that has the worse record wins it anyways, but it is fun to have the gambling aspect in there.

And if you are into the first round being an event, make it one. Go all out.

I remember a couple of years ago, San Fran vs. Houston were playing and whoever lost was getting the #1 overall pick I believe (or close) and those two teams played some of their best Football that game. It was really an entertaining game and I remember San Fran celebrating when they kicked that game winning field goal. Laying down has probably happened before, but like Juke said, even if there is a lottery it more than likely won't stop it.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
adamknite;1487897 said:
I hate the lottery idea, but completely agree on shortening the clock. They've had months to think of all the possible scenerios and to guage other teams interest in a certain player(s). What is 15 minutes going to do?

Me too unless my Grizzlies get the #1 pick :D


No lottery for the NFL. It's bad enough the worst team in the NBA rarely gets the #1 pick as it is.
 

BigDave95

Active Member
Messages
667
Reaction score
135
Alexander;1487900 said:
The main reason I would go for the lottery is that it eliminates the laying down you see late in the year by teams trying to get that choice. Take the top 3-5 and see what happens. Most of the time the team that has the worse record wins it anyways, but it is fun to have the gambling aspect in there.

There was more tanking in the NBA this season than any sport I've ever seen with teams trying to get in position for Oden or Durant... and they have a lottery.
 

carphalen5150

New Member
Messages
1,064
Reaction score
0
Stupid...leave the draft as is. I honestly think that some teams would try to move back into the first just to make a splash before they completed for the day and moved on to round 2 on Sat. Also, there would not be the urgency to get deals done...I mean they would have all night to work out deals. Part of the fun is the scramble for draft positioning when a certain player you like drops.
 

Juke99

...Abbey someone
Messages
22,279
Reaction score
126
This is about one thing and one thing only... $$$

And as we've always seen, once money starts to drive decisions, the sport suffers.
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
I wouldn't mind round 1 on Friday Night if it was shortened to 10 minutes per pick and it was on ABC instead of ESPN. If every team used the entire 10 minutes for their pick it would come to 320 minutes. Dividing that by 60 minutes it is still over 5 hours.

The 15 minutes per team is unreal. The 1st round is potentially 8 hours long that way. I realize the full amount of time will never happen, but it is just annoying that teams take as long as they do already. The best drama they ever had at the Draft was the year Minnesota didn't get their pick in and 2 or 3 teams jumped ahead of them.

That should tell you all you need to know about these teams needing 15 minutes. They don't.

I don't mind the added exposure. That is why I said ABC over ESPN. I don't mind that this is about money. I want the NFL to flourish and the other sports to have to play catch up.

The major drawback I see is when to start the Draft on that Friday night. 5 PM on the West Coast is 8:00 PM on the East Coast. That means a Draft that lasts as long as this one did would be on TV past 2:00 AM on the East Coast. I don't see how they could make that fly and starting before 5:00 for the West Coast will steal viewers from them and that is money out of the register.
 

InmanRoshi

Zone Scribe
Messages
18,334
Reaction score
90
I wouldn't mind the first round on Friday Night. When the first day of the draft takes 10 hours, something needs to be done.
 

Gryphon

Merge Ahead
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
31
NFL may begin draft on Friday to extend its ratings bonanza

The biggest hitch in starting the much-hyped event a day sooner is making sure the first round is done in a timely manner without jeopardizing the process.

Judd Zulgad
Minneapolis Star Tribune
Last update: May 03, 2007 – 8:16 PM

This bit of news should come as no surprise, given the type of ratings the NFL draft continues to produce.
According to an industry source, the league has had preliminary discussions about moving the first round into prime time on Friday. The remaining rounds would be conducted on Saturday and Sunday.

The thinking on this issue appears to be twofold. One, carrying the opening round in prime time means more viewers would be available to watch. Two, some NFL officials believe it would be a good idea to give teams time to decompress before Round 2.

The question becomes how much higher can the ratings get for an event in which the highlight is hearing names called?

The first 4 ½ hours of ESPN's coverage last Saturday had a 5.0 rating -- the network's Sunday night baseball is averaging a 2.8 -- and overall it finished as the second-most viewed draft and tied for the second-highest rated in ESPN's 28 years of televising the event. (The Twin Cities averaged a 3.5 rating, placing Minneapolis-St. Paul 38th out of 55 metered markets.) The NFL Network, which also aired the draft, averaged 367,000 viewers Saturday, beating 26 of the first 30 NHL playoff games that had aired on Versus through April 29.

The biggest issue with having Round 1 of the draft at night would be making sure it could be done in a reasonable amount of time. Saturday's first round took 6 hours, 8 minutes, easily topping the previous high of 5:48 set in 2002. But getting it shortened might be a challenge because there doesn't seem to be much of an appetite from NFL officials to cut down on the current 15 minutes between picks.

A big difference

FSN North began receiving accurate ratings information from Nielsen in mid-April after a glitch caused the media research company to provide the regional sports network with under-reported figures for more than a year. If the new numbers are any indication, FSN is going to be raising its advertising rates.

A few examples: Before the correction, Game 3 of the Wild-Anaheim playoff series on April 15 registered a 2.4 rating. Game 5 of the same series, with the problem fixed, had a 7.0 rating, a 190 percent improvement and the second-highest rated Wild game ever on FSN North. As for the Twins, in the eight games before the correction, they averaged a 5.1 rating. That figure grew by 61 percent to an 8.2 in the eight games after the fix.

Hits and misses

• This probably isn't what the management at Versus wants to see, but one of the best things the network has done during its NHL playoff coverage is pick up the feeds of certain games from the Canadian Broadcasting Company and TSN, which is Canada's version of ESPN. It was actually a bit disappointing Wednesday to find out the San Jose-Detroit game would be a Versus production.

• Was it just me or did tensions between analysts Chris Mortensen and Steve Young seem to be running a bit high during ESPN's NFL draft coverage? It's one thing to debate various topics, it's another to have those debates make viewers uncomfortable.

Fine-tuning

• The Twins plan to increase Jack Morris' role on their radio broadcasts. Originally scheduled to be in the booth for 35 games on KSTP (1500 AM), Morris is now expected to work 45 to 50 contests. This will include all Sunday home games. Herb Carneal, who passed away just before the season, had been slated to work Sunday games from the Metrodome.

• Charles Gonzalez, a sports reporter and anchor at KARE (Ch. 11), is leaving the station for a job at KSAT-TV in his hometown of San Antonio. Gonzalez and his wife, Monika, are new parents and will be closer to family.

• The Winter Arbitron book (January, February and March) came out Thursday. Sports-talker KFAN (1130 AM) tied with 93X for second in the market with a 7.3 share from 6 a.m. to midnight Monday through Sunday in its key demographic of men 25 to 54 years old. ... WCCO (830-AM), meanwhile, saw a substantial growth among persons 25 to 54 during its sports-programming hours of 7 p.m. to midnight in March, pulling a 5.9 share. That was up from a 4.6 last year. The success of the Wild likely played the biggest role. A more detailed breakdown of the book will be out in the coming days.

• KFAN and WCCO are planning horse-racing coverage from 4 to 6 p.m. Saturday. KFAN will carry ESPN Radio's call of the Kentucky Derby; 'CCO, meanwhile, will be at Canterbury Park for the opening day of races. ... NBC is expanding its Kentucky Derby coverage to two hours; the network will be on the air at 3:30 p.m. Saturday and post time is 5:04 p.m. NBC will then premiere its documentary on Barbaro at 7 p.m.

• The Gophers football game against Ohio State on Sept. 29 at the Metrodome is a candidate to be televised in prime time on ABC. If that doesn't happen, it will be on either ESPN or ESPN2. ... ESPN2's New York City-based "Cold Pizza," will relocate to Bristol, Conn., and become known "First Take" as of Monday morning.

• Vikings coach Brad Childress will be in studio with Mark Rosen for his show at 10:35 p.m. Sunday on Ch. 4.

• Coon Rapids' Jim Manthis, the PGA golf professional of the year, will be among those featured as part of a show from 1 to 2 p.m. Saturday on CBS.
 

Juke99

...Abbey someone
Messages
22,279
Reaction score
126
Hostile;1487965 said:
I wouldn't mind round 1 on Friday Night if it was shortened to 10 minutes per pick and it was on ABC instead of ESPN. If every team used the entire 10 minutes for their pick it would come to 320 minutes. Dividing that by 60 minutes it is still over 5 hours.

The 15 minutes per team is unreal. The 1st round is potentially 8 hours long that way. I realize the full amount of time will never happen, but it is just annoying that teams take as long as they do already. The best drama they ever had at the Draft was the year Minnesota didn't get their pick in and 2 or 3 teams jumped ahead of them.

That should tell you all you need to know about these teams needing 15 minutes. They don't.

I don't mind the added exposure. That is why I said ABC over ESPN. I don't mind that this is about money. I want the NFL to flourish and the other sports to have to play catch up.

The major drawback I see is when to start the Draft on that Friday night. 5 PM on the West Coast is 8:00 PM on the East Coast. That means a Draft that lasts as long as this one did would be on TV past 2:00 AM on the East Coast. I don't see how they could make that fly and starting before 5:00 for the West Coast will steal viewers from them and that is money out of the register.


Well the way I see it, 15 minutes isn't all that long a period of time when you're talking about choosing a guy you're going to end up paying several million dollars. AND who could impact your franchise, positively/negatively for many years.

For me, the draft is about wanting my team to get the best guy they can OR to arrange a trade, as we did with the Browns.

If it takes 15 minutes to do so, I'll live with it because the football season is 5 months long. For me the math is, 15 minutes vs 5 months.

:)
 

Hostile

The Duke
Messages
119,565
Reaction score
4,544
Juke99;1487982 said:
Well the way I see it, 15 minutes isn't all that long a period of time when you're talking about choosing a guy you're going to end up paying several million dollars. AND who could impact your franchise, positively/negatively for many years.

For me, the draft is about wanting my team to get the best guy they can OR to arrange a trade, as we did with the Browns.

If it takes 15 minutes to do so, I'll live with it because the football season is 5 months long. For me the math is, 15 minutes vs 5 months.

:)
I agree with you on importance. I am squawking about the TV aspect of it. They can't do a Friday primetime airing with it left at 15 minutes and accomplish what they hope to.
 

speedkilz88

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,947
Reaction score
23,096
The biggest reason the teams want the 15 minutes is because they want time for trades. Sometimes there is quite a lot of negotiating and a lot of picks and points to figure and swap.
 
Top