You said “as usual many fans will not like anything or anyone” this FO does.
Why would you given their track record?
Yet you seem to be criticizing the fans for not giving them the benefit of the doubt yet at the same time you claim to not trust this FO or give them the benefit of the doubt yourself?
Seems very contradictory, poster A says “I don’t trust this FO to do anything right”. You respond “as usual you don’t like anything this FO does”. Then you turn around and say “you know, I don’t trust this FO either”
You don’t have to take a class on Socratic Reasoning at UT to see an obvious contradiction here. As far as me making stuff up, I just dissected and showed step by step how your argument is contradictory, and this is also a clear sign in Socratic Reasoning that your argument is superior when your debate opponent starts turning his argument towards personal trait attacks or using subjective reasoning, I.e. “your argument is invalid because you are a liar”
Clear giveaway, debate judge would hence disqualify you.