No panicking or desperation trades. Consider this.

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
Rather than panicking over the cryptic reports of Glenn's injury and suggesting a plethora of ridiculous desperation trades, consider the following numbers from last season's game against Arizona--a game that Terry Glenn missed due to injury:

Receiving yards
Patrick Crayton: 5 receptions 104 yards 1 TD
Sam Hurd: 4 receptions 42 yards

Passing Yards
Tony Romo: 20-29 308 yards 2 TDs

Total Offense
Cowboys: 434 total yards


Despite Glenn's absence, Romo and the Cowboys offense enjoyed one of their most productive outings of the season.

Not only did Crayton fully replace Glenn's production, he averaged over 20 yards per reception and scored on a 30 yard bomb. Who says he isn't a viable deep threat?

And this penchant for playmaking was hardly an isolated occurence for Crayton; he's played at a high level no matter how the Cowboys have utilized him. In fact, according to KC Joyner, Crayton was the most productive receiver in the NFL last season out of those with 50 or less catches--a group that includes Kevin Curtis.

Furthermore, Hurd snagged 4 passes for over 40 yards, an excellent outing for a third receiver.

Regarding Dallas' injuries, I'm only genuinely concerned about Newman's. Glenn and Ellis are well into their 30s, and the Cowboys have committed a number of resources to finding viable replacements.

Crayton certainly looks the part of a starting-caliber receiver, and he's been patiently biding his time behind Glenn. Crayton may lack Glenn's speed, but he brings a different level of physicality.

Regarding Ellis, the Cowboys have used two first round picks (Carpenter and Spencer) and one second round pick (Burnett) on players who were intended specifically to play Ellis' position. There is talent. Now, it's simply a matter of opportunity.
 

SacredStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,183
Reaction score
1,541
I think Romo had the 2nd most passing yards in the preseason.

And he did it w/o Glenn.

We'll be just fine.
 

aikemirv

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,405
Reaction score
9,999
ScipioCowboy;1626845 said:
Rather than panicking over the cryptic reports of Glenn's injury and suggesting a plethora of ridiculous desperation trades, consider the following numbers from last season's game against Arizona--a game that Terry Glenn missed due to injury:

Receiving yards
Patrick Crayton: 5 receptions 104 yards 1 TD
Sam Hurd: 4 receptions 42 yards

Passing Yards
Tony Romo: 20-29 308 yards 2 TDs

Total Offense
Cowboys: 434 total yards


Despite Glenn's absence, Romo and the Cowboys offense enjoyed one of their most productive outings of the season.

Not only did Crayton fully replace Glenn's production, he averaged over 20 yards per reception and scored on a 30 yard bomb. Who says he isn't viable deep threat?

And this penchant for playmaking was hardly an isolated occurence for Crayton; he's played at a high level no matter how the Cowboys have utilized him. In fact, according to KC Joyner, Crayton was the most productive receiver in the NFL last season out of those with 50 or less catches--a group that includes Kevin Curtis.

Furthermore, Hurd snagged 4 passes for over 40 yards, an excellent outing for a third receiver.

Regarding Dallas' injuries, I'm only genuinely concerned about Newman's. Glenn and Ellis are well into their 30s, and the Cowboys have committed a number of resources to finding viable replacements.

Crayton certainly looks the part of a starting-caliber receiver, and he's been patiently biding his time behind Glenn. Crayton may lack Glenn's speed, but he's bring a different level of physicality.

Regarding Ellis, the Cowboys have used two first round picks (Carpenter and Spencer) and one second round pick (Burnett) on players who were intended specifically to play Ellis' position. There is talent. Now, it's simply a matter of opportunity.

It was against Arizona.

By the way, I am all for giving them a few games to prove they can do it. I hope they convince me!
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
dallasfaniac;1626852 said:
Yeah, but will this stop the sky from falling? Not so sure.

Well, if I don't get a little help here, my back is definitely going to give out.;)
 

TunaFan33

Benched
Messages
1,824
Reaction score
0
aikemirv;1626853 said:
It was against Arizona.

By the way, I am all for giving them a few games to prove they can do it. I hope they convince me!

AZ wasn't as bad as their record indicated. Sure-you are who you are, but they weren't exactly a walk in the park either.
 
Messages
27,093
Reaction score
0
Considering Arizona wasn't all that good last year I'll take those numbers with a grain of salt. I believe the young fellas will have to step up like Miles Austin...
 

sago1

Active Member
Messages
7,791
Reaction score
0
And we think the Giants are the NFL East version of the Colts. Let's get real here.
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
ThreeSportStar80;1626867 said:
Considering Arizona wasn't all that good last year I'll take those numbers with a grain of salt. I believe the young fellas will have to step up like Miles Austin...

The opponent is less important than the manifested, proven ability. Crayton has shown repeatedly that he's capable of performing at a high level against NFL-caliber competition. Now, it's just a matter of increased opportunity.
 

dallasfaniac

Active Member
Messages
4,198
Reaction score
1
Let's consider Glenn and Crayton vs. the Giants

Glenn
9 Games, 45 catches, 614 yards, 2 TDs

Crayton
2 Games, 15 catches, 204 yards, 1 TDs

Crayton has the better average stats against the Giants, although he is runing from 3rd spot.
 

firehawk350

Active Member
Messages
2,108
Reaction score
0
With that logic, against the cowboys...

Santana Moss
4 games, 266 yards, 2 TDs

Brandon Lloyd
3 games, 176 yards, 2 TDs

Santana averaged (per game)
69 yards .5 TDs

Brandon Lloyd averged (per game)
59 yards .67 TDs

Therefore, by using these stats, we can see that as long as the Skins have Brandon Lloyd, we don't need Santana to be successful.[/sarcasm]
 

Clove

Shrinkage
Messages
64,894
Reaction score
27,491
firehawk350;1626914 said:
With that logic, against the cowboys...

Santana Moss
4 games, 266 yards, 2 TDs

Brandon Lloyd
3 games, 176 yards, 2 TDs

Santana averaged (per game)
69 yards .5 TDs

Brandon Lloyd averged (per game)
59 yards .67 TDs

Therefore, by using these stats, we can see that as long as the Skins have Brandon Lloyd, we don't need Santana to be successful.[/sarcasm]
Is Extremeskins.com server down or something?
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
Clove;1626919 said:
Is Extremeskins.com server down or something?
he does make a good point though. we still have T.O. and he is by far better than terry glenn. if romo can't succeed with the weapons he still has, than romo isn't that good. but i think he is
 

dallasfaniac

Active Member
Messages
4,198
Reaction score
1
firehawk350;1626914 said:
With that logic, against the cowboys...

Santana Moss
4 games, 266 yards, 2 TDs

Brandon Lloyd
3 games, 176 yards, 2 TDs

Santana averaged (per game)
69 yards .5 TDs

Brandon Lloyd averged (per game)
59 yards .67 TDs

Therefore, by using these stats, we can see that as long as the Skins have Brandon Lloyd, we don't need Santana to be successful.[/sarcasm]

We can also extrapolate that Crayton is better than both, so yes I feel confident....:)
 

ScipioCowboy

More than meets the eye.
Messages
25,266
Reaction score
17,597
firehawk350;1626914 said:
With that logic, against the cowboys...

Santana Moss
4 games, 266 yards, 2 TDs

Brandon Lloyd
3 games, 176 yards, 2 TDs

Santana averaged (per game)
69 yards .5 TDs

Brandon Lloyd averged (per game)
59 yards .67 TDs

Therefore, by using these stats, we can see that as long as the Skins have Brandon Lloyd, we don't need Santana to be successful.[/sarcasm]

Terry Glenn didn't even play in the game from which I pulled Crayton's stats; consequently, Crayton could not possibly have benefited from Glenn's presence.

Your argument isn't even applicable here.
 
Top