*one last thought about the pats game*

cowboys#1

Finish!
Messages
2,468
Reaction score
131
the media keeps saying the cowboys got dominated. look,the cowboys were down 14-0 and fought back to take the lead 24-21 in the second half. being dominated is being down 48-0 and getting 2 gimmie tds in the 4th quarter. the boys were driving to tie the game in the 4th but penalties cost us. we beat ourselves. nuff said
 

canters

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,676
Reaction score
2,124
Us being dominated fits the media template of the Pat's status as GODS.
 

Eddie

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,092
Reaction score
5,862
The final score is all that matters ... and it shows we were dominated.
 

alancdc

Active Member
Messages
3,295
Reaction score
5
I don't know if we beat ourselves, but it definately wasn't as one sided as the "experts" are claiming it was. I go back, as Romo did, to the 4th and 1 to Barber. First, Barber was at the first down line before the "hold" even might have happened. It wasn't relevant at all to him getting that yard. If we convert there we are at their 45. They hadn't stopped us since the 1st quarter really, and I have no doubt that we get it to 38-38. At that point I do believe it is anyone's game. It sure is easier to play up 7 than it is tied. The Pats won the game, but it was definately closer than it is being portrayed. For the record, Harrison makes me sick. His comments about eating humble popcorn after the game from this steoroid user ticks me off. He got lit up all game.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
What people say means nothing. The Cowboys actions on the field are all that matters. They lost, so they lost. What is good is this season isn't over yet. Until the Cowboys get eliminated, the question is will the Patriots make it back to the SuperBowl to face the Cowboys again? Or will the Colts dispose of them again? :cool:
 

sonnyboy

Benched
Messages
7,357
Reaction score
0
alancdc;1711754 said:
I don't know if we beat ourselves, but it definately wasn't as one sided as the "experts" are claiming it was. I go back, as Romo did, to the 4th and 1 to Barber. First, Barber was at the first down line before the "hold" even might have happened. It wasn't relevant at all to him getting that yard. If we convert there we are at their 45. They hadn't stopped us since the 1st quarter really, and I have no doubt that we get it to 38-38. At that point I do believe it is anyone's game. It sure is easier to play up 7 than it is tied. The Pats won the game, but it was definately closer than it is being portrayed. For the record, Harrison makes me sick. His comments about eating humble popcorn after the game from this steoroid user ticks me off. He got lit up all game.


Fairly certain we were down 24-28 on that drive. Its one of handful of second halves moments I'll be second guessing all month.
The percedure penalty on Witten that nulified the 23 yard gain was the real killer there. That was a huge play and put us on the Pats 38!
You follow up that killer with the 4th and 1 hold......AGHHH to much for me to take!
 

eldog

Member
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
We were not dominated to that extreme. The score looked worse than it was after the Pats scored the last touchdown.
 
Top